We performed a comparison between ArcSight Logger and Check Point Security Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is one of the best products available in the market."
"Some of the most valuable features I really appreciate are the performance, how quick the solution is, and how easy it is to create a query."
"ArcSight's robustness is its most valuable feature."
"I am impressed with the product's ability to pick up logs. It also has UEBA which has reduced the time to take charge of the events."
"Our return on investment for implementing ArcSight Logger over the past 12 months has been positive."
"The ability to customize the solution in great detail is its most valuable features. We can customize the use cases and also have the ability to do scripting. We can personalize our dashboard as well. The scalability the solution offers is quite impressive."
"The most valuable feature is the level of detail that you can see about certain events, even when they do not come up in the console."
"The machine learning is a good feature."
"We love the ability to monitor performance in real-time, and gather critical information about network flows and traffic."
"It provides for capabilities and has allowed us to be more scalable."
"The solution is easy to use and comes with few vulnerabilities. You don't have to worry about release upgrades. Life cycle management is very easy."
"With the generation and review of logs, we have verified some vulnerabilities and attempted attacks to generate improvements in our infrastructure and policies to help avoid issues in the future."
"The cluster solution made our job easier any fault to the device will not halt entire internet connectivity."
"Check Point Security Management has a great feature that allows you to automate the request of the automated server."
"The support is pretty incredible. Check Point has support rep programs that go all the way up to putting one of their own people in your business to help you. Then, they have support programs. If you're an expert, you just need to be able to download updated files and stuff. They have support programs like that, too."
"The firewall cleverly handles such attacks without compromising on performance."
"The console in older versions is not user-friendly."
"ArcSight has been sold two or three times, and the quality has decreased."
"The speed of Logger indexing and searching for certain bugs for some queries that we provide could be improved. It can handle a huge number of logs but it can be improved."
"Using the ArcSight Logger dashboard is not particularly intuitive or efficient, so it is important to be trained in its use."
"The platform is quite expensive. They should reduce its cost."
"It is really difficult to work in ArcSight Logger, as it is very slow."
"The product's connectors should work better and the user manuals need an update."
"I would rate the technical support only 5 out of 10. The technical support is not satisfactory."
"They need to make a Mac version of the SmartConsole, in my opinion."
"The reporting should be improved in future releases. It needs to be very explicit. This is very important."
"The web administration tool that allows administration in the browser must be developed even more."
"Check Point's hybrid cloud integration needs significant improvements. These resources need to evolve as data transfers to the cloud increase, so hybrid cloud models are easier to implement. Better hybrid cloud integration would improve how we manage our security logs and provide our administrators with a low-cost solution that enables them to meet all our essential requirements."
"They could offer educational courses to help individuals improve their knowledge and skills."
"I would like the ability to have an overview, cross-site: One portal that does all firewalls. Also, the user interface is overly complicated."
"It could improve by showing DNS-specific information for connections to unknown public IPs."
"The usability of the solution could be improved."
More Check Point Security Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
ArcSight Logger is ranked 20th in Log Management with 31 reviews while Check Point Security Management is ranked 10th in Log Management with 56 reviews. ArcSight Logger is rated 7.8, while Check Point Security Management is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of ArcSight Logger writes "A scalable and stable solution that enables users to see all the event logs in one place". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Check Point Security Management writes "Great DDoS protection, high availability, and useful firewall rule implementation". ArcSight Logger is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security, IBM Security QRadar, Elastic Security, Wazuh and LogRhythm SIEM, whereas Check Point Security Management is most compared with Wazuh, Fortinet FortiAnalyzer, IBM Security QRadar, LogRhythm SIEM and Splunk Cloud Platform. See our ArcSight Logger vs. Check Point Security Management report.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.