We performed a comparison between Armis and Tenable Security Center based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7 and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management."The solution has a lean and easy-to-use interface that is not confusing to first-time users."
"The usability is really good. It's very easy to use and a good platform. It is scalable and very stable. The technical support is fine and the setup is super easy."
"Tenable is the leading product for vulnerability scanning."
"The most important features are the dashboard and reporting. The dashboard provides statistics with graphs and bar charts for our management."
"Tenable Security Center scans networks and gives reports."
"I find Tenable SC to be a very scalable product."
"Compared to other products, the most valuable features of the solution are its ease of use and ability to provide visibility over scan results while providing many templates to users, making it a helpful tool."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the vulnerability assessment."
"We face difficulties in integrating the product with ticketing tools like ServiceNow."
"Armis doesn't have a back intel feature."
"The reporting needs a lot of work on the template."
"Tenable SC can improve by adding more integrations with HCI-type tools and more accurate vulnerability detection."
"The product could be user-friendly, and they could enhance the web application's security features."
"At times we have had the typical bugs."
"The integration is very good, although it still needs to improve."
"A good plugin editor would be a good additional option for the Security Center."
"Tenable has some problems with agents going offline during scanning and lag between agents and the security center."
"The solution is expensive."
Armis is ranked 13th in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 2 reviews while Tenable Security Center is ranked 1st in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 48 reviews. Armis is rated 8.6, while Tenable Security Center is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Armis writes "Improves device visibility and adapts according to an organization’s security demands". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Security Center writes "A security solution for vulnerability assessment with automated scans". Armis is most compared with Nozomi Networks, Forescout Platform, Axonius, Claroty Platform and CyberX, whereas Tenable Security Center is most compared with Tenable Vulnerability Management, Qualys VMDR, Tenable Nessus, Rapid7 InsightVM and Horizon3.ai.
See our list of best Risk-Based Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
