We performed a comparison between Armis and Tenable Vulnerability Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7 and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management."The solution provides seamlessness, a perfect UI, and identity management for office operations. We are most vulnerable to users. Therefore, it is crucial to implement the right solution to ensure proper user access and resource management."
"The initial setup is straightforward so long as your infrastructure, components, and networks are in place."
"The solution can integrate with third parties and meets standard compliance."
"It is easy to manage. Most of the information the tool provided helped to further investigate the vulnerability and its impact."
"The integration of Tenable into our security ecosystem was very good."
"The vulnerability management itself is the most valuable feature as well as references to the mitigation techniques."
"It is very stable, and it is updated periodically by adding new vulnerabilities."
"The solution's most valuable feature is providing a single pane of visibility on all the infrastructure and its status."
"Armis doesn't have a back intel feature."
"We face difficulties in integrating the product with ticketing tools like ServiceNow."
"The pricing of the solution could be more reasonable."
"The interface could be improved; right now it's running on two interfaces simultaneously."
"I'm not satisfied with the reporting structure."
"The stability has room for improvement."
"The one drawback that we have found is the reports."
"The product could be easier to set up on the cloud."
"The reporting was never great in Tenable Vulnerability Management, so, in my company, we imported all the data into Ivanti RiskSense to start using it for reporting."
"It can have more integration."
More Tenable Vulnerability Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Armis is ranked 13th in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 2 reviews while Tenable Vulnerability Management is ranked 2nd in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 39 reviews. Armis is rated 8.6, while Tenable Vulnerability Management is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Armis writes "Improves device visibility and adapts according to an organization’s security demands". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Vulnerability Management writes "Discovers vulnerabilities and integrates well with other solutions". Armis is most compared with Nozomi Networks, Forescout Platform, Axonius, Claroty Platform and Phosphorus Cybersecurity, whereas Tenable Vulnerability Management is most compared with Tenable Security Center, Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Amazon Inspector and Wiz.
See our list of best Risk-Based Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
