We performed a comparison between Aruba ClearPass and Tenable Security Center based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, HPE Aruba Networking, Forescout and others in Network Access Control (NAC)."Access Tracker is invaluable for troubleshooting access control incidents and quickly getting to the root cause."
"We are able to satisfy many different organizational needs because of its flexibility."
"ClearPass's best feature is its comprehensiveness."
"Aruba has improved my organization because it supported me on my level of access."
"I like the integration options with a multitude of other vendors and Aruba applications."
"The interface is very easy to use and the workflow is quite straightforward."
"Its clustering model saved us staff time and reduced errors by eliminating the need to manage individual RADIUS servers."
"A lot of the issues in Forescout are mitigated in Aruba ClearPass, it supports all the expected protocols."
"Tenable.sc is user-friendly."
"I found the dashboard features very useful. It made it easy to track remediation progress. I could publish dashboards to remediation teams and track the progress on the dashboards."
"I think that this is a good solution for evaluating vulnerability in the network."
"This solution has a much lower rate of false positives compared to competing products."
"The solution is one of the most, if not the most, stable product available."
"The scanning part, the agent part – that's the valuable aspect."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the vulnerability assessment."
"Tenable Security Center scans networks and gives reports."
"Some functions could be improved."
"The solution needs to upgrade its user interface. Right now, it's not so user friendly, and it's an aspect that my clients' wish was improved upon."
"After HP, their support is the worst."
"The improvement can be in the cloud area. They can improve it for the cloud so that we can deploy it on the cloud."
"If you look at the tool's deployment phase from a fine-tuning perspective, I feel it was very complex."
"I would like the area of managing wired technology to be improved. Wireless is very good but I'm still struggling a bit to do my end to end configurations in the wired technology area."
"I can't think of an area where the solution is lacking a feature or a capability."
"This solution could be improved by making it possible to use it across different territories. Currently, if a user moves from the US to the UK, their usage and access will be restricted."
"There is not much room for improvement. However, there should be a guide that describes the step-by-step procedures for doing tasks. Otherwise, training is required from a senior guy to a junior guy."
"Tenable SC can improve by adding more integrations with HCI-type tools and more accurate vulnerability detection."
"Support could be faster."
"The solution's user interface has some issues."
"Tenable.sc's user interface could be improved."
"The solution is expensive."
"The pricing is reasonable, but this could be brought down more aggressively, such as we see with Rapid7, Tenable SC's main competitor."
"Current web page needs improvement, slows down processes."
Aruba ClearPass is ranked 2nd in Network Access Control (NAC) with 75 reviews while Tenable Security Center is ranked 1st in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 48 reviews. Aruba ClearPass is rated 8.6, while Tenable Security Center is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Aruba ClearPass writes "Easy to use, multifeatured, and reliable policy management platform for identity authentication and new device onboarding". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Security Center writes "A security solution for vulnerability assessment with automated scans". Aruba ClearPass is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Fortinet FortiNAC, Forescout Platform, Microsoft Intune and Varonis Platform, whereas Tenable Security Center is most compared with Tenable Vulnerability Management, Qualys VMDR, Tenable Nessus and Rapid7 InsightVM.
We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.