Aruba Instant On Switches vs Cisco Nexus comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
HPE Aruba Networking Logo
2,699 views|1,424 comparisons
93% willing to recommend
Cisco Logo
2,674 views|2,018 comparisons
96% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Aruba Instant On Switches and Cisco Nexus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two LAN Switching solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Aruba Instant On Switches vs. Cisco Nexus Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Its customer service is good.""It is easy for deployment and configuration.""The solution is plug-and-play and auto-configured.""Instant On Switches' best feature is the 1930, which is stackable.""Regarding the feature, my clients are currently favoring it because it enables them to switch back to phone functionality.""The cost and simplicity of the product are its most valuable features.""Setup is easy.""The solution has a simple deployment and zero border."

More Aruba Instant On Switches Pros →

"The solution is very expensive. Currently, we pay an yearly licensing cost. I rate the pricing a nine out of ten.""It is a scalable, reliable, stable and efficient solution.""Cisco Nexus and Cisco Catalyst have processing power and offer good utilization of Cisco devices.""It provides a very flexible connection to a server. When you go into history and the VPC, it provides a very flexible connection from it. Once a server goes down I can instruct it easily. So the network actually keeps quality even if onsite it is down.""We have continuity with Cisco, which provides a very high-end solution.""When it comes to data centers, Cisco Nexus is the best.""The consolidation of all of the layer two ports into one rack is very valuable.""The most valuable features are that it is easy to use, provides stability, easy to configure, low latency, and it provides communication to the data center."

More Cisco Nexus Pros →

Cons
"We are interested in acquiring a firewall that provides a comprehensive solution. In other words, we're seeking a firewall that encompasses multiple aspects, such as exceptional switches and active phone functionalities.""Instant On Switches' layer 3 and visibility could be improved.""Tracking with instant switches needs improvement.""You cannot use many VLANs, like VLAN 10, VLAN 20, VLAN 30, and VLAN 100 on Aruba Instant On AP.""It is not a very scalable solution.""The solution’s GUI should be improved a bit.""The solution does not have any console access. For example, if you do not have internet access on your side and you need to configure anything, you should at least have CLI access to do something or manage the solution to put to some IP. It will only work if we have a TSCT on the network.""Room for improvement would be if they consolidated administration from multiple locations."

More Aruba Instant On Switches Cons →

"The only thing to improve is to continue to get better.""I would like to see more on-device programmability, as it seems to be lacking in this platform.""The implementation process could be easier, which is something that should be improved.""I would like to see more automation and for it to be easier to use.""The pricing must be improved.""Overall, I wish it was a more intuitive OS.""The installation process lasted too long, taking 16 to 24 hours for full completion.""The cost of the support can be improved. We had critical operations, and we needed 24/7 support for 365 days, which was quite expensive. We had to go for a very costly support contract, which was really a concern. The availability of spare parts, especially in a remote location such as Egypt, can also be improved."

More Cisco Nexus Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Pricing is competitive, and there are no supplementary fees."
  • "The license for Instant On Switches is free."
  • "I give the price seven out of ten."
  • "It is an expensive solution."
  • "We pay an annual licensing fee."
  • "The pricing is cheap."
  • "Aruba Instant On Switches is not expensive."
  • "Aruba Instant On Switches is cheaper than Cisco and expensive compared to some Chinese brand products."
  • More Aruba Instant On Switches Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Costs more than most, but the reliability pays for the difference."
  • "The price of this solution is good when compared to others in the market."
  • "Our licensing fees are approximately $2,000 USD per year."
  • "Every Cisco product is more expensive than competitors on the market, which is just a fact, but from my perspective, it is worth it."
  • "All of our costs including subscription, licensing, and support services are bundled together, and the cost is approximately $100,000 USD per year."
  • "This is a very expensive product."
  • "The license for Cisco Nexus is one year to three years, in this case for the SMARTnet. It is a price per unit, in terms of this specific appliance."
  • "Our licensing costs for this solution are approximately $200 USD per month."
  • More Cisco Nexus Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which LAN Switching solutions are best for your needs.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The solution has a simple deployment and zero border.
    Top Answer:The solution neither offers advanced features nor security. It could have an MSP portal version.
    Top Answer:The product's initial setup phase is very easy.
    Top Answer:Cisco Nexus is not a cheaply priced product. The tool offers a perpetual-based licensing model and subscription-based licensing model. For Cisco's hardware and RMA process, you need to opt for a… more »
    Top Answer:The product's high price is an area of concern where improvements are required. Cisco Nexus should lower its current prices.
    Ranking
    5th
    out of 16 in LAN Switching
    Views
    2,699
    Comparisons
    1,424
    Reviews
    14
    Average Words per Review
    316
    Rating
    8.5
    6th
    out of 16 in LAN Switching
    Views
    2,674
    Comparisons
    2,018
    Reviews
    9
    Average Words per Review
    431
    Rating
    8.6
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Aruba Instant On 1930 Switches
    Learn More
    Overview

    The Aruba Instant On 1930 switches features advanced, smart-managed, fixed configuration Gigabit switches designed for small businesses that are easy-to-deploy and affordable. They’re made to handle today’s bandwidth-heavy applications like voice and video conferencing, enabling consistent connectivity to enhance performance. Using either the Instant On mobile app or the cloud-based web portal, you can quickly set up, monitor and manage the 1930 switch series from anywhere at any time. What’s more, up to 30 W PoE power delivery is available out-of-the-box for your class 4 PoE devices, like access points, surveillance cameras and VoIP phones, all easily managed from the same platform.

    The Cisco Nexus family of switches is designed to meet the stringent requirements of the next-generation data center. Not simply bigger or faster, these switches offer the following characteristics: infrastructure that can be scaled cost-effectively and that helps you increase energy, budget, and resource efficiency, transport that can navigate the transition to 10 Gigabit Ethernet and unified fabric and can also handle architectural changes such as virtualization, Web 2.0 applications, and cloud computing and operational continuity to meet your need for an environment where system availability is assumed and maintenance windows are rare if not totally extinct.
    Sample Customers
    KEMET, Vestavia Hills City Schools, Dropbox
    Advanced Medical Transport, Banco de Guayaquil, Baylor Scott & White Health, BH Telecom, Bowling Green State University, Calligaris, Children's Hospital Colorado, City of Biel, Del Papa Distributing, Department of Justice, Dimension Data, Dualtec Cloud Builders, Electricity Authority of Cyprus, Grupo Industrial Saltillo (GIS), Hertz, K&L Gates , LightEdge, Lone Star College System, Management Science Associates, Mindtree, NBC Olympics, Quest, Sony Corporation, The Department of Education in Western Australia, Valley Proteins
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company30%
    University20%
    Construction Company10%
    Outsourcing Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Educational Organization8%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Construction Company8%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Government14%
    Manufacturing Company12%
    Comms Service Provider12%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company26%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Government7%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business55%
    Midsize Enterprise27%
    Large Enterprise18%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business42%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise41%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise71%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise59%
    Buyer's Guide
    Aruba Instant On Switches vs. Cisco Nexus
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Aruba Instant On Switches vs. Cisco Nexus and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Aruba Instant On Switches is ranked 5th in LAN Switching with 22 reviews while Cisco Nexus is ranked 6th in LAN Switching with 101 reviews. Aruba Instant On Switches is rated 8.4, while Cisco Nexus is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Aruba Instant On Switches writes "A very stable tool that needs to offer better startup speed". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cisco Nexus writes " Offer high performance capabilities and enables efficient data transmission and processing". Aruba Instant On Switches is most compared with HPE ProCurve, Cisco Catalyst Switches and NETGEAR Switches, whereas Cisco Nexus is most compared with Cisco Catalyst Switches, Juniper QFX Series Switches, Arista Networks Platform, Dell PowerConnect Switches and HPE ProCurve. See our Aruba Instant On Switches vs. Cisco Nexus report.

    See our list of best LAN Switching vendors.

    We monitor all LAN Switching reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.