We performed a comparison between Aruba Wireless and Omada Access Points based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless LAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."You can easily monitor, manage, and cover all your IT equipment."
"The solution is pretty generic and easy to use."
"Overall, we've been very pleased with the performance."
"The simplicity is great."
"The AI capabilities of Mist Wireless are superior to other OEMs."
"The artificial intelligence feature is very good."
"The most valuable feature of Juniper Mist is the Virtual Network Assistant, powered by artificial intelligence."
"With Mist, every Wednesday they roll out new features."
"We have three wireless networks: One for employee use, one for guest use, and one for our warehouse use, which uses MAC authentication. These wireless networks just simply work, they do not fail. The IAP-205 devices are very strong with great range. Very durable equipment; it always works."
"Our wireless overhaul has reduced the number of wireless related help desk tickets by nearly 90%."
"The initial setup was very simple."
"Scalability has been one of the easiest aspects of the Aruba Instant product line. As long as the models are compatible, you can simply connect it to your network and it will learn the settings from the other APs on the network and join the AP network."
"The product improved overall scalability and simplicity in configuring and replacing. The use of an Aruba Controller to configure multiple APs was game-changing."
"With Aruba Instant, we can use the access points independently, allowing us to position them in many places."
"Support through third party vendors or direct from HPE has been easy to manage. They are very responsive."
"APs are very easy to configure to the network once they contact the controller."
"The initial setup is not complicated."
"We use Omada Access Points for the network and Wi-Fi."
"When this solution is set up, it is solid. It offers fast deployment."
"Omada Access Points are very good in terms of wired technologies and wired connectivity."
"The solution's most valuable feature is its price."
"Its sturdiness and cost-effectiveness are the most valuable features."
"This product is easy to use."
"The performance and availability of Omada Access Points have met our business needs, particularly in improving network control and facilitating direct access for developers to branch services."
"The product should include adaptive Wi-Fi to show a more accurate location."
"There is room for improvement in terms of support and installation."
"Juniper Wireless AP can improve by continually improving its reporting and integration with other systems."
"Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) could improve if the MIST platform had a built-in master key. This would be an advantage."
"Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points’ support services need improvement."
"If you want to do more specific stuff, it's a bit limited."
"I need a bit more time with it before criticizing the features."
"Enrolling into the tool is a tedious process."
"A lot of the access point commands are in the command line interface, versus being in the GUI."
"Their documentation needs to be improved. Aruba's documentation is poor."
"Aruba’s poor performance and random upgrade issues caused too much time consuming maintenance and troubleshooting."
"The solution's GUI for configuration could be better."
"Needs improvement in point-to-point deployment products."
"The dashboards that represent the network access control in Aruba Wireless could improve."
"An area for improvement in Aruba Wireless is creating a DMZ. Without Aruba ClearPass, you need to allow guess access directly via the internet, which means you need to implement the security in between, so this is what I'd like Aruba to improve in the product."
"I believe that Aruba's support could be improved."
"Omada's ordering platform could be improved, though. Some of their distributors are a pain to work with."
"It is less affordable for smaller businesses."
"There is room for wider improvements and additional features to enhance managing capabilities."
"Omada could add some API integrations that would help with our automated solution. We're trying to integrate, and we're having some issues because some of the calls are not there. The API still needs some development."
"The price of the solution is an area requiring improvement since I want the solution to be made available at a cheaper price than its current market price."
"We have some issues with stability. It is not so fast. That is the main problem."
"Aruba has better scaling capabilities."
"The solution takes a long time to switch to another connection, which should be improved."
More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Pricing and Cost Advice →
Aruba Wireless is ranked 1st in Wireless LAN with 138 reviews while Omada Access Points is ranked 15th in Wireless LAN with 14 reviews. Aruba Wireless is rated 8.4, while Omada Access Points is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Aruba Wireless writes "The portal for centralized management and virtual controller for APs are very valuable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Omada Access Points writes "They have good specs, and the price is lower than competing solutions". Aruba Wireless is most compared with Cisco Wireless, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, Ruckus Wireless, Ubiquiti WLAN and ExtremeWireless, whereas Omada Access Points is most compared with Ruckus Wireless, Ubiquiti WLAN, Aruba Instant, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN and Cisco Wireless. See our Aruba Wireless vs. Omada Access Points report.
See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
