Asana vs Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management comparison

"By using this software, I have adaptability in my work, and it can improve the production of our company."

"The solution scales well."

"Asana's most valuable aspect is its ability to consolidate all tasks and projects onto a single board, allowing for seamless navigation through timelines from start to finish. Additionally, it enables the inclusion of key stakeholders and provides a private communication channel for discreet discussions. The organizational component of Asana is particularly beneficial, including its coding features."

"Asana has a wonderful user experience that is very easy to interact with and has tons of integrations with other products and tools."

"It is stable and easy to set up."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its project management tracking systems."

"I like how easy it is to use the rules within Asana."

"It's an easy way to communicate."

"I like Primavera's planning capabilities."

"The solution's tech support is good."

"The most valuable feature of Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is accuracy."

"The ability to streamline the process of obtaining signatures from our contractors is valuable."

"Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is a well-engineered product from an IT perspective."

"The stability of Asana is good. However, there are some issues with maintenance, when the solution is down. For example, there might be maintained for a few hours where we cannot use the solution."

"On the development side for technical project management, Asana is missing features. We only use it for discussing tasks and strategies, and we use it for customer to-do lists. It doesn't have the source code integration that Jira and Jira Service Desk both have."

"Auto-shift is an essential feature for planning, but it's currently not there. It should have this feature so that when you move a task that depends on another task, the dates should be auto-shifted. For example, you have two tasks dependent on each other. When the parent task is moved or delayed, the child task should also be delayed, and the date should be shifted. When we have a very long timeline, it's very complex to go task by task and shift the dates on the task. Auto-shift is a fantastic and basic feature of project management, and having such a feature in Asana would make our lives much easier. If Asana added this feature, it would complete the suit and close the project management cycle because currently, there is a gap."

"We have not used Asana on our private server. We have been using the cloud solution. We need an on premise solution for government agencies."

"For large teams, scalability should be improved."

"If you have been using a tool like Jira for many years, it make time some time to get used to the minimalist layout in Asana."

"The messaging feature could be better."

"Having a quick way to do video inside the platform or video communication could be very handy."

"Primavera could be better integrated with other products, and it needs more cost management features."

"The reporting could improve project management. We need multiple source reports. If someone is new to the support it has a steep learning curve."

"The solution's user interface is an area with shortcomings that need improvement."

"The scalability has room for improvement."

"They should work on integrating the solution with ERP."

"The solution's free version can be used for basic functions."

"For what it brings to the table, I think Asana is fairly affordable. I would like to see the portfolio feature in our pricing plan, but other than that, it's definitely pretty good."

"The price of this solution makes it quite accessible, and the plans fit my budget."

"I can describe Asana's pricing as a sweet spot since it is neither very high nor very low, especially regarding the value Asana adds to its products...In our company, we use 50 percent of the features provided by Asana, because of which we only pay 50 percent of Asana's total cost."

"Asana has two different types of structures: company vs workspace. Company is really best if all the users you plan to assign work to are all internal (have the same corporate domain in their user ID email address). Once one person signs up (even for a free account) with a corporate email address, Asana will automatically relate that person to that company, if it already exists. If you plan to use it for external collaboration as well as internal, then creating a workspace is a better approach."

"The cost is $25 US per unit per month."

"There is a free version of Asana, but we use the paid version to receive all the features we want. The overall price is reasonable."

"Its price is fair. Its licensing cost is cheaper than Microsoft Project. I would rate it a two out of five in terms of pricing."

"My company has made an annual payment towards the costs of the solution. Price-wise, the solution is okay."

"Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is an expensive solution. There is an upfront cost to purchase the solution and then there are annual fees to use the solution."

"The solution is highly priced compared to one of its competitors."

"The solution itself is cost-effective."