We performed a comparison between ASP.NET and SharePoint Designer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two .NET Development Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is very easy to maintain because UI management is simple and many libraries are available."
"ASP.NET is stable. I did not have to do any maintenance on it."
"The most valuable feature of ASP.NET is the support of multiple platforms with ASP.NET Core. Additionally, Azure integrates well with ASP.NET and Visual Studio."
"The most valuable feature is that it's easy to use."
"The solution is easy to learn, understand and develop."
"This framework is very easy to use and tweak for our business needs."
"It is easy to install ASP.NET on your laptop."
"ASP.NET works well with Windows applications and more generally, the Windows platform."
"The document filing system is the solution's most valuable feature. We have used SharePoint as an option for a document managed system, like Documentum and IBM Filenet."
"The scalability is excellent, and I rate it ten out of ten."
"The most valuable aspects of the solution are the user-friendly interface and easy workflow."
"The most valuable part of the solution is its ability to allow for a high degree of customization."
"What I found most valuable in SharePoint Designer is that through it, you can perform a lot of SharePoint functionalities, such as creating SharePoint lists and libraries, as well as customizing pages."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The solution tightly integrates with all other collaboration tools."
"SharePoint has very good features for collaboration."
"The solution is out of date and should not be used."
"Sometimes we have issues with instability and it crashes, which is something that should be made to work better."
"In my opinion, this solution should improve their web toolkit."
"Sometimes it can be really difficult to debug using ASP.NET. When there's an issue, trying to find out the cause is not always easy, so debugging is the top area for improvement, in my opinion."
"ASP.NET is a very slow tool, and it should be faster."
"You are required to have knowledge of C#."
"In the future, I would like to see more AI and machine learning technologies made available in libraries."
"Performance is an area that can always be improved."
"If you compare the workflow with other engines like Olympus and K2, it is very complicated to create a workflow."
"This solution could definitely be made easier to use."
"SharePoint Designer could improve most in analytics and reporting."
"The solution is not scalable at all."
"Designer is easy to manage."
"Adding guest users is a bit difficult on SharePoint."
"The pricing is a little bit high and can be reduced."
"The new SharePoint Designer is very limited."
ASP.NET is ranked 3rd in .NET Development Services with 30 reviews while SharePoint Designer is ranked 2nd in .NET Development Services with 49 reviews. ASP.NET is rated 8.4, while SharePoint Designer is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of ASP.NET writes "Beneficial thread management, and asynchronous processing, and template-driven setup". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SharePoint Designer writes "Intuitive, customizable, and reliable". ASP.NET is most compared with Microsoft Silverlight, whereas SharePoint Designer is most compared with Microsoft Visual Studio. See our ASP.NET vs. SharePoint Designer report.
See our list of best .NET Development Services vendors.
We monitor all .NET Development Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
