We performed a comparison between AuraQuantic and Bizagi based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Process Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."AuraPortal has the best price for its process."
"AuraPortal is very user-friendly and flexible."
"It's a low-code application."
"AuraQuantic's most valuable features are the zero code, user-friendly mode, and integration."
"The solution's simulation capabilities are the most valuable aspects."
"I very much like the reusable rules and forms, and the way Bizagi controls the process flow. I also like the document generating system to generate PDFs and then .doc files with information gathered from a flow. At the end of a process, you can generate a document that can be printed."
"Process management is easy with Bizagi; validating processes and assigning resources is straightforward."
"Agility, reverse engineering, customized portal web, help desk and user guides, easy deployment, simple to modify."
"It is easy to use and easy to learn. It is also fully compatible with BPMN virtual tool. Bizagi is very fast in responding to and fixing the issues."
"The solution offers a free version of their product."
"The natural notation is the best feature of Bizagi because it makes it compatible with other products."
"Great software for managing my business. I think this is the best business process management software."
"More documentation and the ability to extract different reports about different relations in the objects I use will help."
"We'd like it more animated. It would be useful if we could integrate GIFs, for example."
"One thing that could be improved would be for it to be deployed in a shorter time."
"AuraQuantic's price could be improved."
"Bizagi's UI should include shorter steps for documenting controls, documenting properties, changing some attributes in the object, and adding additional text."
"It is difficult to drive ROI on types of processes involving complex business rules."
"For the small business, this is very bad because it is still fragmented. The licensing policy should be more flexible and small company oriented. In micro-small companies, there should only be one or two. That's not the problem. Maybe it is too flexible, there are so many pieces that you need to put together. When you have a small business, it can be a little complicated, not so easy."
"The solution was very limited."
"The tool is expensive and it should improve its pricing."
"The on-premise software has some bugs."
"They should improve the migration process between major versions, from version 9 to 10, we had to redo our implementation."
"Its price can be improved. The price is high for the application as well as for maintaining and developing applications. When you develop, for example, a BPM, you need to pay a lot for Bizagi."
AuraQuantic doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Process Automation with 6 reviews while Bizagi is ranked 7th in Process Automation with 78 reviews. AuraQuantic is rated 8.8, while Bizagi is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of AuraQuantic writes "Responsive support, easy to use, and reliable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Bizagi writes "A flexible, customizable solution that reduced time to market, but the UI and customer support could be better". AuraQuantic is most compared with Appian and Camunda, whereas Bizagi is most compared with Camunda, Visio, Bonita, Microsoft Power Apps and ARIS BPA. See our AuraQuantic vs. Bizagi report.
See our list of best Process Automation vendors, best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors, and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
