We performed a comparison between AWS Application Migration Service and VMware SRM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Zerto, Nasuni and others in Cloud Migration."Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten...Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten...I rate the solution's support a ten out of ten."
"The product is reasonably priced."
"Live Migration's best feature is that it's free."
"The most valuable feature is the live, block-to-block replication."
"The CloudEndure feature is most valuable because it is user friendly and very simple."
"I like how VMware SRM is able to automate and orchestrate disaster recovery."
"Our systems fail over using SRM. So, we do a big bang DR, which is biannual, and we fail over our fairly massive Epic electronic health record (EHR) and our core applications. It takes us about 30 minutes to fail over using SRM, which is pretty good. In most hospitals that have Epic installed, Epic does the audit to make sure that we can fail over if something were to happen. Normally, sites will have a DR solution specific to the EHR, but right now, our pain point is the third-party tier-one clinical applications."
"The most valuable feature is the simplicity of operations."
"The most valuable features are the disaster recovery and testing."
"SRM's best feature is automation."
"The stability of SRM has been excellent. It gets a nine-out-of-ten."
"Combined with RecoverPoint, it offers zero RPO and zero RTO."
"This SRM solution can improve your footprint within a data center."
"Live Migration has some issues with target setups."
"I do not see any improvements required for the CloudEndure."
"I think it is important to have more logs, and more details would be great because we have just logged on the client's side, but there weren't many details on the cloud."
"We would like to have a disaster recovery feature included in this solution."
"One drawback to using CloudEndure is that the default is to give one small, lightweight server, which is created in the cloud."
"VMware SRM needs to improve its pricing."
"The price, in general, could be lower."
"There are many functionality problems with the product currently. It is also slow and unstable."
"You cannot use VMware SRM in conjunction with storage replication software."
"We have had an issue when some customers have traditional designs and sites. For example, on one another site, they are using hyper-converged, using VMware, or Nutanix. We have a problem with the synchronization between the storage for site to site. This is the main issue. We are adding some other tools to support the synchronization to allow the movement of the workload from site to site easily."
"In my opinion, the integration with Peer Persistent Storage could be improved."
"It has a lot of dependencies on VMware infrastructure, and testing can be complex. Testing often requires extensive approval at the organizational level."
"The user experience could be more friendly."
More AWS Application Migration Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
AWS Application Migration Service is ranked 9th in Cloud Migration with 5 reviews while VMware SRM is ranked 6th in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software with 73 reviews. AWS Application Migration Service is rated 8.2, while VMware SRM is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AWS Application Migration Service writes "With great technical support in place, the solution ensures a return on investment for its users ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware SRM writes "A scalable solution that integrates well with the VMware platform, but its platform agnostics do not support on-cloud usage". AWS Application Migration Service is most compared with Zerto and Carbonite Migrate, whereas VMware SRM is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Zerto, Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines, Azure Site Recovery and Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service .
We monitor all Cloud Migration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.