We performed a comparison between AWS Glue and IBM Cloud Pak for Integration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Our entire use case was very easily handled or solved using this solution."
"AWS Glue is a good solution for developers, they have the ability to write code in different languages and other software."
"Transformations are valuable because you can modify or override complex data logic from an open source or Spark to solve issues."
"We no longer had to worry much about infrastructure management because AWS Glue is serverless, and Amazon takes care of the underlying infrastructure."
"I like its integration and ability to handle all data-related tasks."
"We have found it beneficial when moving data from one source to another."
"The facility to integrate with S3 and the possibility to use Jupyter Notebook inside the pipeline are the most valuable features."
"AWS Glue's best features are scalability and cloud-based features."
"It is a stable solution."
"The most preferable aspect would be the elimination of the command, which was a significant improvement. In the past, it was a challenge, but now we can proceed smoothly with the implementation of our policies and everything is managed through JCP. It's still among the positive aspects, and it's a valuable feature."
"The most valuable aspect of the Cloud Pak, in general, is the flexibility that you have to use the product."
"Cloud Pak for Integration is definitely scalable. That is the most important criteria."
"I have encountered challenges with multi-region support."
"The solution’s stability could be improved."
"The price of the solution could improve."
"There should be more connectors for different databases."
"The interface for AWS Glue could improve, they do not put a lot of details. You can write the code, in PySpark or in Scala, which is a big advantage, it is only easy to use for a developer. It will be difficult for new users to enter the cloud environment."
"The product is expensive for data streaming. This area needs improvement."
"Overall, I consider the technical support to be fine, although the response time could be faster in certain cases."
"It fails to handle massive databases acquired from various sources."
"The initial setup is not easy."
"The pricing can be improved."
"Its queuing and messaging features need improvement."
"Setting up Cloud Pak for Integration is relatively complex. It's not as easy because it has not yet been fully integrated. You still have some products that are still not containerized, so you still have to run them on a dedicated VM."
More IBM Cloud Pak for Integration Pricing and Cost Advice →
AWS Glue is ranked 1st in Cloud Data Integration with 37 reviews while IBM Cloud Pak for Integration is ranked 14th in Cloud Data Integration with 4 reviews. AWS Glue is rated 7.8, while IBM Cloud Pak for Integration is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of AWS Glue writes "Provides serverless mechanism, easy data transformation and automated infrastructure management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Cloud Pak for Integration writes "A hybrid integration platform that applies the functionality of closed-loop AI automation". AWS Glue is most compared with AWS Database Migration Service, Informatica PowerCenter, SSIS, Informatica Cloud Data Integration and Talend Open Studio, whereas IBM Cloud Pak for Integration is most compared with IBM App Connect, IBM API Connect, IBM DataPower Gateway, MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager and SAP Data Services. See our AWS Glue vs. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration report.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.