We performed a comparison between AWS GuardDuty and SUSE NeuVector based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: AWS GuardDuty offers consolidated data collection and alerts. Users like GuardDuty's ability to monitor AWS accounts without extra costs and analyze logs from various sources. SUSE NeuVector is commended for its integration with CI/CD pipelines and automation. AWS GuardDuty users requested a mobile version for remote workers, more dashboard analytics, and improvements to GuardDuty's threat intelligence platform. SUSE NeuVector could add support for scanning IaaS and virtual machines and improve integration with other security tools.
Service and Support: Customers of AWS GuardDuty have praised the Amazon team for their exceptional customer service, describing support as fast and responsive. SUSE NeuVector users find the support process to be complex, but they describe the support team as knowledgeable and helpful.
Ease of Deployment: AWS GuardDuty's initial setup process has been praised for its simplicity and efficiency. Some SUSE NeuVector users thought the setup was easy, while others perceive it as complex and challenging. Users noted that technical expertise is required to integrate NeuVector with pipelines.
Pricing: AWS GuardDuty has a competitive pay-go pricing model with different tiers, and the total cost depends on data usage. SUSE NeuVector is generally considered affordable, and customers can negotiate discounts based on the number of users. Reviewers noted that customers must pay for support separately.
ROI: AWS GuardDuty delivers value by enhancing overall security and building trust, potentially opening up new business prospects. SUSE NeuVector yields the greatest returns for high-risk sectors such as financial services, but its ROI may be limited for other sectors, such as retail.
Comparison Results: Our users prefer AWS GuardDuty over SUSE NeuVector. AWS GuardDuty offers a single cloud-based solution for data collection and alerts, allowing users to monitor their AWS accounts without any additional costs. Users find the setup process for AWS GuardDuty to be simple and easy, while SUSE NeuVector can be tricky to deploy without expertise.
"The real-time detection and response capabilities overall are great."
"The mean time to detect has been reduced."
"The solution is a good alerting tool."
"We really appreciate the Slack integration. When we have an incident, we get an instant notification. We also use Joe Sandbox, which Singularity can integrate with, so we can verify if a threat is legitimate."
"The multi-cloud support is valuable. They are expanding to different clouds. It is not restricted to only AWS. It allows us to have different clouds on one platform."
"The most valuable features of PingSafe are the asset inventory and issue indexing."
"It's helped free up staff time so that they can work on other projects."
"We noted immediate benefits from using the solution."
"With anomaly detection, active threat monitoring, and set correlation, GuardDuty alerts me to any unusual user behavior or traffic patterns right away, which is great for staying on top of potential security risks."
"The solution will detect abnormalities in the AWS workload and alert us so that we can monitor and take action."
"We use the tool for threat detection. AWS includes AI features as well. AWS GuardDuty gives us reports."
"Deployment is great, and we didn't face any big challenges."
"The out-of-band malware detection from the EBS volumes. It's really cool. No agents or anything needed, it automatically finds and correlates based on malware."
"The solution provides AWS GuardDuty S3 protection, EKS runtime protection, and malware protection."
"Since our environment is cloud based and accessible from the internet, we like the ability to check where the user has logged in from and what kind of API calls that user is doing."
"It kinda just gives us another layer of security. So it does provide some sort of comfort that we do have something that is monitoring for abnormal behavior."
"When it comes to the price, we got a really good deal from the vendor instantly."
"The UI has a lot of features."
"The most valuable feature of SUSE NeuVector is its run-time security."
"The initial setup is quite good, it's straightforward."
"The most valuable feature of SUSE NeuVector is the performance, deployment, and cost."
"The features of image scanning and anti-malware are really valuable."
"The tool's deployment is simple. Also, I am impressed with its risk capabilities."
"One of the issues with the product stems from the fact that it clubs different resources under one ticket."
"When we get a new finding from PingSafe, I wish we could get an alert in the console, so we can work on it before we see it in the report. It would be very useful for the team that is actively working on the PingSafe platform, so we can close the issue the same day before it appears in the daily report."
"The Infrastructure as Code service available in PingSafe and the services available in AWS cloud security can be merged so that we can get the security data directly from AWS cloud in PingSafe. This way, all the data related to security will be in one single place. Currently, we have to check a couple of things on PingSafe, and we have to validate that same data on the AWS Cloud to be sure. If they can collaborate like that, it will be great."
"PingSafe takes four to five hours to detect and highlight an issue, and that time should be reduced."
"For vulnerabilities, they are showing CVE ID. The naming convention should be better so that it indicates the container where a vulnerability is present. Currently, they are only showing CVE ID, but the same CVE ID might be present in multiple containers. We would like to have the container name so that we can easily fix the issue."
"It does not bring much threat intel from the outside world. All it does is scan. If it can also correlate things, it will be better."
"There is no break-glass account feature. They should implement this as soon as possible because we can't implement SSO without a break-glass feature."
"Sometimes the Storyline ID is a bit wacky."
"For me, I would say just the presentation of findings, like the dashboards and other stuff, could be improved a bit."
"It would be great if the solution had some automation capabilities."
"There is currently no consolidated dashboard for AWS GuardDuty. It would be helpful if they could provide a dashboard based on severity levels (high, medium, low) and offer insights account-wise, especially for users utilizing automation structures."
"I work in a bank, and it would be good if AWS GuardDuty could be integrated with other monitoring and detection tools we use."
"AWS GuardDuty sometimes shows false positives and should have better detection accuracy."
"Cost changes. It's very expensive. If you turn on every feature, it's more than most commercial vendors. For smaller orgs, that doesn't make sense."
"For the next release, they could provide IPS features as well."
"An improvement would be to have a mobile version where remote workers can log in and monitor and fix issues."
"SUSE NeuVector should provide more security protection rules and better container image scanning."
"The image-scanning features need improvement."
"The tool should offer seamless integration of other security tools while in a hybrid environment."
"SUSE NeuVector could improve by increasing its visibility into other elements of the DevSecOps pipeline. Additionally, scanning around infrastructure would be helpful."
"I would say that this solution should improve monitoring and reporting. I would also like to see more integrations so that we could essentially make it a part of a developing pipeline."
"We are also working with IaaS VMS, but NeuVector doesn't support virtual machines."
"The documentation needs to improve a bit."
More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
AWS GuardDuty is ranked 4th in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) with 20 reviews while SUSE NeuVector is ranked 15th in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) with 7 reviews. AWS GuardDuty is rated 8.2, while SUSE NeuVector is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of AWS GuardDuty writes "A stellar threat-detection service that has helped bolster security against malicious threats". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SUSE NeuVector writes "Good value for money; great for policy management". AWS GuardDuty is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security and Wiz, whereas SUSE NeuVector is most compared with Sysdig Falco, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Aqua Cloud Security Platform, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes and Sysdig Secure. See our AWS GuardDuty vs. SUSE NeuVector report.
See our list of best Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
