AWS Lake Formation vs BigQuery comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
4,795 views|3,994 comparisons
75% willing to recommend
Google Logo
3,751 views|2,734 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AWS Lake Formation and BigQuery based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Warehouse solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed AWS Lake Formation vs. BigQuery Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It is seamlessly integrated within the AWS ecosystem, making it straightforward to manage access patterns for AWS-native services.""The solution has many features that are applicable to events such as audits.""The solution is quite good at handling analytics. It's done a good job at helping us centralize them.""The most important advantage in using AWS Lake Formation is its ability to connect the data lake to the other technologies in AWS. This is what I advise my clients.""We use AWS Lake Formation typically for the data warehouse."

More AWS Lake Formation Pros →

"Even non-coders can review the data in BigQuery.""There are some performance features like partitioning, which you can do based on an integer, and it improves the performance a lot.""It has a proprietary way of storing and accessing data in its own data store and is 100% managed without you needing to install anything. There is no need to arrange for any infrastructure to be able to use this solution.""As a cloud solution, it's easy to set up.""The query tool is scalable and allows for petabytes of data.""We basically used it to store server data and generate reports for enterprise architects. It was a valuable tool for our enterprise design architect.""It's similar to a Hadoop cluster, except it's managed by Google.""The solution's reporting, dashboard, and out-of-the-box capabilities match exactly our requirements."

More BigQuery Pros →

Cons
"It falls short when it comes to more granular access control, such as cell-level or row-level entitlements which is a significant drawback for organizations that require precise control over who can access specific rows of data.""In our experience what could be improved are not the support, performance or monitoring, but at a managerial level, the very expensive professional services of AWS. This could be an area of improvement for them. It's too expensive to acquire their support.""The solution could make improvements around orchestration and doing some automation stuff on AWS front automation. It would be useful if we could use automation to build images and use hardened images which are CIS compliant.""AWS Lake Formation's pricing could be cheaper.""For the end-users, it's not as user-friendly as it could be."

More AWS Lake Formation Cons →

"With other columnar databases like Snowflake, you can actually increase your VM size or increase your machine size, and you can buy more memory and it will start working faster, but that's not available in BigQuery. You have to actually open a ticket and then follow it up with Google support.""The solution should reduce its pricing.""We'd like to have more integrations with other technologies.""When it comes to queries or the code being executed in the data warehouse, the management of this code, like integration with the GitHub repository or the GitLab repository, is kind of complicated, and it's not so direct.""I rate BigQuery six out of 10 for affordability. It could be cheaper.""I would like to see version-based implementation and a fallback arrangement for data stored in BigQuery storage. These are some features I'm interested in.""I noticed recently it's more expensive now.""The initial setup could be improved making it easier to deploy."

More BigQuery Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "AWS Lake Formation is a bit expensive."
  • More AWS Lake Formation Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "I have tried my own setup using my Gmail ID, and I think it had a $300 limit for free for a new user. That's what Google is offering, and we can register and create a project."
  • "BigQuery is inexpensive."
  • "One terabyte of data costs $20 to $22 per month for storage on BigQuery and $25 on Snowflake. Snowflake is costlier for one terabyte, but BigQuery charges based on how much data is inserted into the tables. BigQuery charges you based on the amount of data that you handle and not the time in which you handle it. This is why the pricing models are different and it becomes a key consideration in the decision of which platform to use."
  • "The price is a bit high but the technology is worth it."
  • "The price could be better. Usually, you need to buy the license for a year. Whenever you want more, you can subscribe to it, and you can use it. Otherwise, you can terminate the license. You can use it daily or monthly, and we use it based on a project's requirements."
  • "The solution is pretty affordable and quite cheap in comparison to PDP or Cloudera."
  • "BigQuery pricing can increase quickly. It's a high-priced solution."
  • "The pricing is good and there are no additional costs involved."
  • More BigQuery Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Warehouse solutions are best for your needs.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:It is seamlessly integrated within the AWS ecosystem, making it straightforward to manage access patterns for AWS-native services.
    Top Answer:There are significant challenges when dealing with external applications, and vendors, or pursuing a hybrid cloud strategy because AWS Lake Formation is specific to AWS and does not integrate… more »
    Top Answer:The initial setup process is easy.
    Top Answer:They could enhance the platform's user accessibility. Currently, the structure of BigQuery leans more towards catering to hard-code developers, making it less user-friendly for data analysts or… more »
    Ranking
    12th
    Views
    4,795
    Comparisons
    3,994
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    578
    Rating
    6.0
    5th
    Views
    3,751
    Comparisons
    2,734
    Reviews
    29
    Average Words per Review
    485
    Rating
    8.1
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    AWS Lake Formation is a service that makes it easy to set up a secure data lake in days. A data lake is a centralized, curated, and secured repository that stores all your data, both in its original form and prepared for analysis.

    BigQuery is an enterprise data warehouse that solves this problem by enabling super-fast SQL queries using the processing power of Google's infrastructure. ... You can control access to both the project and your data based on your business needs, such as giving others the ability to view or query your data.

    Sample Customers
    bp, Cerner, Expedia, Finra, HESS, intuit, Kellog's, Philips, TIME, workday
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government5%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    Transportation Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Retailer7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise72%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business31%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise48%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise67%
    Buyer's Guide
    AWS Lake Formation vs. BigQuery
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Lake Formation vs. BigQuery and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    AWS Lake Formation is ranked 12th in Cloud Data Warehouse with 5 reviews while BigQuery is ranked 5th in Cloud Data Warehouse with 31 reviews. AWS Lake Formation is rated 7.6, while BigQuery is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of AWS Lake Formation writes "Strategically aligning data management in a multi-cloud environment with significant reporting challenges". On the other hand, the top reviewer of BigQuery writes "Expandable and easy to set up but needs more local data residency". AWS Lake Formation is most compared with Snowflake, Azure Data Factory, Amazon Redshift, Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics and Amazon EMR, whereas BigQuery is most compared with Snowflake, Teradata, Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse, Vertica and Oracle Exadata. See our AWS Lake Formation vs. BigQuery report.

    See our list of best Cloud Data Warehouse vendors.

    We monitor all Cloud Data Warehouse reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.