We performed a comparison between AWS PrivateLink and Perimeter 81 based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenVPN, Fortinet, Cisco and others in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN."It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"The solution has good performance."
"It is a very stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"Distributing the agent was very simple, allowing us to enforce security posture on our devices (i.e. S1, Disk-encryption, etc.)."
"The solution provides us with an easy way to configure and join the VPN with Perimeter 81."
"The benefits are really built into the underlying protocol, however, Perimeter81 makes these available in a user-friendly way."
"Their split tunneling feature has been very valuable to our company since implementing the Perimeter 81 solution."
"Perimeter 81 provides a very secure and non-disruptive experience."
"Perimeter 81 is very pretty."
"It has provided a seamless gateway to much-needed platforms."
"Our operators can work from home without any problems."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"Security is an area of concern in the product where the solution needs to improve."
"I'd love to learn more about all of the features. Maybe a monthly spotlight of features or having a banner that explains more ways certain features could be used would be helpful."
"Currently, I am not able to define a different country or location, which can result in negative experiences as the tool is being recognized by websites and this can make it difficult to access them or force me to disable the program temporarily."
"It would be nice to have a notification sound when Perimeter81 disconnects, as I sometimes don't notice when the icon shows that it's disconnected, and I end up wasting time waiting for my browser to load a page that shows an error, usually error 404."
"I would suggest adding more networking and security features that allow more customization within their platform."
"Perimeter 81 could enhance its reporting and analytics capabilities to provide more detailed insights into network activity."
"The overall UI could be improved and updated to bring a simpler feel to the application."
"I don't know if it is technically feasible, however, if the Desktop App could be used as a Web App or a Chrome Extension it would be very nice."
"A Google Chrome extension would be handy instead of logging into the app."
AWS PrivateLink is ranked 15th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 1 review while Perimeter 81 is ranked 8th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 22 reviews. AWS PrivateLink is rated 7.0, while Perimeter 81 is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of AWS PrivateLink writes "A highly stable tool that needs to improve its security". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Perimeter 81 writes "Great SAML and SCIM support with the ability to deploy site-2-site tunnels with specific IP restrictions". AWS PrivateLink is most compared with AWS Direct Connect, Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, Check Point Remote Access VPN and NordLayer, whereas Perimeter 81 is most compared with Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange, Cato SASE Cloud Platform, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, Cloudflare Access and Tailscale.
See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
