We performed a comparison between AWS Savings Plans and Cloudability based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Cost Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The initial setup is very easy."
"The most valuable feature of AWS Savings Plans is we can discuss budgets briefly during our confirmation process since we are aware of our usual consumption patterns. Creating budgets in this regard would be beneficial, as it would allow us to consume only what we need, without including reserve instances that do not serve our purpose."
"We use the product to get a detailed level of transparency on the cloud strengths."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its ability to create reports and dashboards."
"The pricing isn't too expensive."
"The tool helps us to resize on AWS correctly."
"Transparency and visibility are the key features."
"The sizing recommendation will look, and say, "You are only using this at 80%," then recommend a better fit for you."
"Cloudability takes care of identifying and managing the cloud."
"The most crucial feature in reducing my cloud costs has been the rightsizing recommendations, along with the dashboards that track reserved instance spending coverage and utilization. As for Cloudability's integration with our existing cloud infrastructure, it's not integrated directly into our AWS infrastructure but rather reads and pulls data from it, providing valuable insights and analysis for cost management."
"The visibility of AWS Savings Plans could improve."
"In the future, it would be interesting if there could be a combination of Savings Plans and some Reserved Servers."
"Cloudability needs to improve on data collection from cloud sources."
"There are also some limitations with the dashboards and data representation in Cloudability."
"I would like the API functionality to improve. The update time after uploading data could also be improved."
"I wish there was a feature to temporarily remove certain recommendations from the list for teams that couldn't implement them immediately. I believe Cloudability could improve its automation functionality and enhance cost allocation modeling."
"Cloudability needs to focus on more cloud providers."
"The API is not well-documented. It is not straightforward and difficult to use. This needs to be improved, as it is very difficult for our developers to develop automation around it."
"We would like them to have a linear regression, so we can be predictive for budgets, allocations, and the year's follow ups. We also want to have a longer window of analytics with better certainty that our workload will fit the model, not just in a two week window."
"In general, I feel Cloudability wasn't able to support many resources."
AWS Savings Plans is ranked 6th in Cloud Cost Management with 2 reviews while Cloudability is ranked 5th in Cloud Cost Management with 13 reviews. AWS Savings Plans is rated 9.0, while Cloudability is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of AWS Savings Plans writes "Scales well, is easy to set up, and is designed to help companies save money". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cloudability writes "An excellent solution for dealing with multiple clouds". AWS Savings Plans is most compared with Azure Cost Management, Zesty and IBM Turbonomic, whereas Cloudability is most compared with Azure Cost Management, VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth, IBM Turbonomic, Densify and Zesty. See our AWS Savings Plans vs. Cloudability report.
See our list of best Cloud Cost Management vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Cost Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.