We performed a comparison between AWS WAF and R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), F5, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF)."The product’s availability, ease of configuration, and documentation are valuable."
"We do not have to maintain the solution."
"AWS WAF is a stable solution. The performance of the solution is very good."
"The ease of deployment of the product is valuable to me."
"AWS has flexibility in terms of WAF rules."
"The initial setup was very straightforward. Deployment took about ten minutes or less."
"This is not a product that you need to install. You just use it."
"The stability of AWS WAF is valuable."
"The three most valuable features that I noticed are the geo-localization of the user, the IP reputation, and the compartmental analysis."
"The cost must be reduced."
"It will be helpful if the product recommends rules that we can implement."
"The pricing model is complicated."
"It's a bit difficult to apply the right rules for the right security."
"This solution could be improved if the configuration steps were more specific to WAF, compared to other cloud services."
"They have to do more to improve, to innovate more features. They need to increase the security. It has to be more active in detecting threats."
"I would like to see the addition of more advanced rate-limiting features in the next release. It would be beneficial to extend rate limiting beyond just web servers to the main node level."
"We have issues with reporting, troubleshooting, and analytics. AWS WAF needs to bring costs down."
"The area that should be improved is licensing."
AWS WAF is ranked 1st in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 52 reviews while R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) is ranked 33rd in Web Application Firewall (WAF). AWS WAF is rated 8.0, while R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of AWS WAF writes "A highly stable solution that helps mitigate different kinds of bot attacks and SQL injection attacks". On the other hand, the top reviewer of R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) writes "Geo-localization and IP reputation help to keep our clients secure and more available". AWS WAF is most compared with Azure Web Application Firewall, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, F5 Advanced WAF, Imperva Web Application Firewall and Fortinet FortiWeb, whereas R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) is most compared with Akamai App and API Protector.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.