We performed a comparison between Axcient x360Recover and Azure Site Recovery based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Commvault, Nutanix and others in Disaster Recovery as a Service."It's super stable. We really like it."
"Azure Site Recovery helps to save costs."
"What I love about Azure Site Recovery is its simplicity for basic configurations."
"Azure Site Recovery allows my company to save around 30 percent of the time on every VM that we need to back up and restore."
"We use the solution across hospitality and healthcare domains. We use it for custom development. It helps us develop a seamless omnichannel for the healthcare industry."
"The documentation is good, and it can be integrated with other products."
"The solution is secure, reliable, and scalable."
"Site Recovery's most valuable features include its user-friendly console and the ease of migration."
"Our primary use case is for disaster recovery and business continuity and disaster recovery (BCDR)."
"As of today, I have to shut everything down and the entire resource has to be offline while I'm doing the recovery. So having the ability to kind of recover while running would be a great feature to have."
"I conveyed the feedback to the agent, suggesting an increase in the agent count in our VNS in the USA. I also addressed notification concerns, as some issues didn't trigger alerts during a recent call."
"In the newest version of Azure Site Recovery, the configuration was a little more complex, so this is an area for improvement."
"The pricing predictability and clarity around the final cost of the plan of this solution could be improved."
"We need to be able to move the virtual servers and not build and then port them across. They need to improve the hypervisor."
"Could have more integration with other platforms."
"The tool should improve synchronization."
"It is for site-to-site replication. When something goes wrong on your site, you only get 15 minutes before it also goes wrong on your replicated site. There should be some way to be able to say that we want to restore it, but we want to restore it to the version from yesterday. It should support versioning. I would also like to see real-time scanning for advanced threat protection, more straightforward billing, and quicker turnaround on the tech support."
"Azure Site Recovery's deployment is complex. There are a lot of bugs, and it needs to improve stability."
Earn 20 points
Axcient x360Recover is ranked 10th in Disaster Recovery as a Service while Azure Site Recovery is ranked 1st in Disaster Recovery as a Service with 19 reviews. Axcient x360Recover is rated 9.0, while Azure Site Recovery is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Axcient x360Recover writes "State-of-the-art disaster recovery". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Azure Site Recovery writes "Useful for restoration purposes that ensures that the users get to save a lot of time". Axcient x360Recover is most compared with , whereas Azure Site Recovery is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Zerto, VMware SRM, AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery and Commvault Cloud.
See our list of best Disaster Recovery as a Service vendors.
We monitor all Disaster Recovery as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.