We performed a comparison between Azure Cost Management and CloudCheckr based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Cost Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The tool helps with budgeting and reporting. It notifies us whenever we cross the threshold."
"The solution helps us diagnose and understand why some resources cost more so that we can fine-tune and reduce the cost."
"The cost analysis and exportability are the most valuable features of the solution."
"During the two years I've been working with this solution, it has only been down once or twice. Thus, I would rate the stability of the solution at nine out of ten."
"I like the fact that you can set alerts on the predicted cost in Azure Cost Management."
"The most valuable feature is that our customers can see their consumption in real time. Even though we have a couple of analytics provided by our company, those are not in real time."
"We use the solution as a cost management tool to control the budget. It is easy to mange costs with the product."
"The best thing about Azure Cost Management is the cost analysis functionality because it provides regular alerts."
"It will automatically suggest areas for optimization."
"The solution is mostly stable."
"It's one of the leading players for cloud optimization. It's hard to find anything better."
"The recommendation section is pretty helpful."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The best feature I like about CloudCheckr CMx High Security is its simplicity. I love that it's not rocket science to use the solution. Even if you're not familiar with the cloud, you can easily figure out how to use CloudCheckr CMx High Security. You can use AWS, you can use Azure, and you can use GCP with the solution because the integration is quite simple. You can also use multi-cloud with it, and you could see the billing part. You'll have complete visibility into your cost which I love about the solution. I also love that data on any security issues and vulnerabilities are available on the go with CloudCheckr CMx High Security. You don't need to do anything different. Just run the scan and you'll have all these open findings in the tool, in terms of the priority level, so if it's critical, it will tell you, "It's critical," and you need to fix it right away."
"The solution is scalable for our purposes."
"The most valuable feature of CloudCheckr CMx High Security is granular reporting. Additionally, the user interface is easy to use."
"All the offers should be on the console. You shouldn't need to select from different tabs."
"The solution's technical support should be faster, more knowledgeable, and customer-friendly."
"Improved integration with other solutions could definitely be beneficial."
"The affordability of licenses and subscription fees is a critical consideration, as not all companies can easily manage the cost of expensive licenses."
"Azure Cost Management should be made cheaper."
"I would like to see some features included for costing and more information about the components of deployment. Sometimes, it's very difficult to match the component with the solution because the descriptions are not very clear."
"The dashboard could be improved."
"Be wary of unnecessary costs."
"What needs to be improved in CloudCheckr CMx High Security is integration. All the clouds are going quite fast, for example, all the cloud providers: Microsoft, Google, etc. CloudCheckr CMx High Security is good with AWS, no doubt about it, but with Azure and Google Cloud, I find that the solution is slow in that direction. If the vendor planned for CloudCheckr CMx High Security to be automated just for AWS, then it does make sense. If not, if the vendor is also targeting good integration with Google and Microsoft, then CloudCheckr CMx High Security integration needs improvement, in particular, it has to be faster. At the moment, its integration with Azure is not as good as its integration with AWS. With GCP, integration is nowhere."
"CloudCheckr CMx High Security is complex. There are a lot of menus, and if you do not know what you are looking for you can get lost. However, the interface is self-explanatory. It's easy to understand where to go to get what you want."
"Self-healing could be a bit smoother and a bit cleaner, easier to access and more functional. That would help."
"Many features still need to be implemented in this tool."
"The performance of the tool really needs to be improved."
"The solution needs to work better with larger capacities of data."
"The reporting and analytic capabilities are very limited."
"The solution must improve its user interface."
Azure Cost Management is ranked 2nd in Cloud Cost Management with 41 reviews while CloudCheckr is ranked 7th in Cloud Cost Management with 8 reviews. Azure Cost Management is rated 8.0, while CloudCheckr is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Azure Cost Management writes "A good, but limited cost information solution with strong analytics but requiring more flexibility in its reporting functionality". On the other hand, the top reviewer of CloudCheckr writes "Beneficial granular reporting, highly stable, and excellent support". Azure Cost Management is most compared with IBM Turbonomic, VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth, AWS Savings Plans, Cloudability and Amazon CloudWatch, whereas CloudCheckr is most compared with AWS Trusted Advisor, Apptio One, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Cloudability and VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth. See our Azure Cost Management vs. CloudCheckr report.
See our list of best Cloud Cost Management vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Cost Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.