Azure Data Factory vs Snowflake comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Microsoft Logo
8,126 views|6,366 comparisons
91% willing to recommend
Snowflake Computing Logo
21,234 views|11,994 comparisons
96% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary
Updated on Mar 6, 2024

We compared Snowflake and Azure Data Factory based on our user's reviews in several parameters.

Based on user reviews, Snowflake is praised for its high performance, scalability, and ease of use, while Azure Data Factory is appreciated for its seamless integration with data sources and robust monitoring capabilities. Snowflake's customer service and support received positive feedback, while Azure Data Factory is praised for its prompt assistance and responsiveness. Users find Snowflake's pricing and licensing terms flexible and reasonable compared to similar solutions, while Azure Data Factory is valued for its fair pricing and straightforward setup process. Both platforms have been reported to provide a positive ROI, with Snowflake benefiting from enhancements to improve user experience and functionality, and Azure Data Factory needing improvements in user interface, documentation, resource allocation, data integration capabilities, performance, stability, and debugging processes.

Features: Snowflake's valuable features include high performance, scalability, and ease of use. Users appreciate its efficient handling of large volumes of data and its user-friendly interface. On the other hand, Azure Data Factory is praised for its seamless integration with various data sources, ability to orchestrate complex data workflows, and robust monitoring capabilities.

Pricing and ROI: Snowflake and Azure Data Factory both receive positive feedback regarding their pricing, setup process, and licensing options. Users find Snowflake's setup process relatively uncomplicated, while Azure Data Factory's setup is described as seamless. Additionally, both products offer flexible and adaptable licensing options to meet various business needs., Snowflake: User reviews indicate positive ROI. Azure Data Factory: User feedback shows positive ROI with cost savings, improved productivity, streamlined data integration and migration, scalability, flexibility, and robust functionality.

Room for Improvement: Snowflake could benefit from enhancements to enhance user experience and functionality, while Azure Data Factory has areas for improvement in its user interface, documentation, resource allocation, data integration capabilities, performance, stability, and debugging process.

Deployment and customer support: Based on user feedback, Snowflake and Azure Data Factory have differences in the duration required for establishing a new tech solution. While Snowflake emphasizes the importance of considering separate deployment and setup phases, Azure Data Factory users reported varying timeframes, with some taking three months for deployment and others only a week for setup., Snowflake's customer service has been positively received by users, particularly for the expertise and effectiveness of their support team. On the other hand, Azure Data Factory's customer service has been consistently praised for their prompt assistance and knowledgeable staff.

The summary above is based on 84 interviews we conducted recently with Snowflake and Azure Data Factory users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure Data Factory vs. Snowflake Report (Updated: May 2024).
771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Q&A Highlights
Question: Which is better for Snowflake integration, Matillion ETL or Azure Data Factory (ADF) when hosted on Azure?
Answer: Below is a comparison between Matillion ETL and Azure Data Factory for Snowflake integration when Azure Data Factory and Snowflake are hosted on Azure, based on feedback from others: If you are using Snowflake on Azure, Azure Data Factory may be a good choice because of its tight integration with Azure. If you need to perform complex data transformations, then Matillion ETL may be a better choice because it offers more powerful ETL functionality. If you are on a tight budget, Azure Data Factory may be a better choice because it is reportedly more affordable. Matillion ETL Pros: They say it is more powerful and flexible Reportedly has better support for complex data transformations May be easier to use and maintain Cons:Reportedly more expensive than Azure Data Factory Azure Data Factory Pros: Reportedly more affordable than Matillion ETL More tightly integrated with Azure Reportedly more scalable and reliable Cons: They say it is less powerful and flexible May not offer as much good support for complex data transformations May be more difficult to use and maintain Matillion ETL may be a better choice for organizations that need a powerful and flexible ETL solution, even if it may be more expensive. Azure Data Factory may be a better choice for organizations that need an affordable and scalable ETL solution, even if it may be less powerful and flexible.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The scalability of the product is impressive.""Azure Data Factory's most valuable features are the packages and the data transformation that it allows us to do, which is more drag and drop, or a visual interface. So, that eases the entire process.""On the tool itself, we've never experienced any bugs or glitches. There haven't been crashes. Stability has been good.""It is a complete ETL Solution.""The most valuable aspect is the copy capability.""The feature I found most helpful in Azure Data Factory is the pipeline feature, including being able to connect to different sources. Azure Data Factory also has built-in security, which is another valuable feature.""For developers that are very accustomed to the Microsoft development studio, it's very easy for them to complete end-to-end data integration.""We haven't had any issues connecting it to other products."

More Azure Data Factory Pros →

"The solution is very stable.""The solution is very easy to use.""It requires no maintenance on our part. They handle all that. The speed is phenomenal. The pricing isn't really anything more than what you would be paying for a SQL server license or another tool to execute the same thing. We have zero maintenance on our side to do anything and the speed at which it performs queries and loads the data is amazing. It handles unstructured data extremely well, too. So, if the data is in a JSON array or an XML, it handles that super well.""It's ultra-fast at handling queries, which is what we find very convenient.""The most valuable feature of Snowflake is its performance. We can access the data quickly. Additionally, it handles structured and non-structured data.""The most valuable feature is the clone copy.""The ability to share the data and the ability to scale up and down easily are the most valuable features. The concept of data sharing and data plumbing made it very easy to provide and share data. The ability to refresh your Dev or QA just by doing a clone is also valuable. It has the dynamic scale up and scale down feature. Development and deployment are much easier as compared to other platforms where you have to go through a lot of stuff. With a tool like DBT, you can do modeling and transformation within a single tool and deploy to Snowflake. It provides continuous deployment and continuous integration abilities. There is a separation of storage and compute, so you only get charged for your usage. You only pay for what you use. When we share the data downstream with business partners, we can specifically create compute for them, and we can charge back the business.""My company wanted to have all our data in one single place and this what we use Snowflake for. Snowflake also allows us to build connectors to different data sources."

More Snowflake Pros →

Cons
"The initial setup is not very straightforward.""Lacks in-built streaming data processing.""Sometimes I need to do some coding, and I'd like to avoid that. I'd like no-code integrations.""We have experienced some issues with the integration. This is an area that needs improvement.""Currently, smaller businesses face a disadvantage in terms of pricing, and reducing costs could address this issue.""For some of the data, there were some issues with data mapping. Some of the error messages were a little bit foggy. There could be more of a quick start guide or some inline examples. The documentation could be better.""The solution should offer better integration with Azure machine learning. We should be able to embed the cognitive services from Microsoft, for example as a web API. It should allow us to embed Azure machine learning in a more user-friendly way.""We require Azure Data Factory to be able to connect to Google Analytics."

More Azure Data Factory Cons →

"An additional feature I'd like to see is called materialized views, which can speed up some run times. I'd like it to be able to be used where you can have multiple tables inside them; materialized view. That would be nice. As well as being able to run cursors, to be able to do some bulk updates and some more advanced querying, table building on the fly.""The design of the product is easily misunderstood.""There are some challenges with loading unstructured data and integrating some message queues or brokers. In one project, we had a problem connecting to one of the message queues and we had to take a different route altogether on Microsoft Azure.""Its stability could be better.""Snowflake has support for stored procedures, but it is not that powerful.""The user interface continues to be an issue, especially when we need to get data out of Snowflake. It's very easy to get data in, but it's not too easy to get it out or extract it.""The scheduling system can definitely be better because we had to use external airflow for that. There should be orchestration for the scheduling system. Snowflake currently does not support machine learning, so it is just storage. They also need some alternatives for SQL Query. There should also be support for Spark in different languages such as Python.""There are always a few operation updates here and there that can be made."

More Snowflake Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "In terms of licensing costs, we pay somewhere around S14,000 USD per month. There are some additional costs. For example, we would have to subscribe to some additional computing and for elasticity, but they are minimal."
  • "This is a cost-effective solution."
  • "The price you pay is determined by how much you use it."
  • "Understanding the pricing model for Data Factory is quite complex."
  • "I would not say that this product is overly expensive."
  • "The licensing is a pay-as-you-go model, where you pay for what you consume."
  • "Our licensing fees are approximately 15,000 ($150 USD) per month."
  • "The licensing cost is included in the Synapse."
  • More Azure Data Factory Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Pricing can be confusing for customers."
  • "The whole licensing system is based on credit points. You can also make a license agreement with the company so that you buy credit points and then you use them. What you do not use in one year can be carried over to the next year."
  • "You pay based on the data that you are storing in the data warehouse and there are no maintenance costs."
  • "It is not cheap."
  • "The pricing for Snowflake is competitive."
  • "On average, with the number of queries that we run, we pay approximately $200 USD per month."
  • "Pricing is approximately $US 50 per DB. Terabyte is around $US 50 per month."
  • "The price of Snowflake is very reasonable."
  • More Snowflake Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Warehouse solutions are best for your needs.
    771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:AWS Glue and Azure Data factory for ELT best performance cloud services.
    Top Answer:Azure Data Factory is flexible, modular, and works well. In terms of cost, it is not too pricey. It offers the stability and reliability I am looking for, good scalability, and is easy to set up and… more »
    Top Answer:Azure Data Factory is a solid product offering many transformation functions; It has pre-load and post-load transformations, allowing users to apply transformations either in code by using Power… more »
    Top Answer:The best thing about Snowflake is its flexibility in changing warehouse sizes or computational power.
    Top Answer:The real-time streaming feature is limited with Snowflake and could be improved. Currently, Snowflake doesn't support unstructured data. With Snowflake, you need to be very particular about the type… more »
    Ranking
    3rd
    Views
    8,126
    Comparisons
    6,366
    Reviews
    47
    Average Words per Review
    509
    Rating
    8.0
    1st
    Views
    21,234
    Comparisons
    11,994
    Reviews
    36
    Average Words per Review
    464
    Rating
    8.3
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Snowflake Computing
    Learn More
    Overview

    Azure Data Factory efficiently manages and integrates data from various sources, enabling seamless movement and transformation across platforms. Its valuable features include seamless integration with Azure services, handling large data volumes, flexible transformation, user-friendly interface, extensive connectors, and scalability. Users have experienced improved team performance, workflow simplification, enhanced collaboration, streamlined processes, and boosted productivity.

    Snowflake is a cloud-based data warehousing solution for storing and processing data, generating reports and dashboards, and as a BI reporting source. It is used for optimizing costs and using financial data, as well as for migrating data from on-premises to the cloud. The solution is often used as a centralized data warehouse, combining data from multiple sources.

    Snowflake has helped organizations improve query performance, store and process JSON and XML, consolidate multiple databases into one unified table, power company-wide dashboards, increase productivity, reduce processing time, and have easy maintenance with good technical support.

    Its platform is made up of three components:

    1. Cloud services - Snowflake uses ANSI SQL to empower users to optimize their data and manage their infrastructure, while Snowflake handles the security and encryption of stored data.
    2. Query processing - Snowflake's compute layer is made up of virtual cloud data warehouses that let you analyze data through requests. Each of the warehouses does not compete for computing resources, nor do they affect the performance of each other.
    3. Database storage - Snowflake automatically manages all parts of the data storage process, including file size, compression, organization, structure, metadata, and statistics.

    Snowflake has many valuable vital features. Some of the most useful ones include:

    • Snowflake architecture provides nearly unlimited scalability and high speed because it uses a single elastic performance engine. The solution also supports unlimited concurrent users and workloads, from interactive to batch.
    • Snowflake makes automation easy and enables enterprises to automate data management, security, governance, availability, and data resiliency.
    • With seamless cross-cloud and cross-region connections, Snowflake eliminates ETL and data silos. Anyone who needs access to shared secure data can get a single copy via the data cloud. In addition, Snowflake makes remote collaboration and decision-making fast and easy via a single shared data source.
    • Snowflake’s Data Marketplace offers third-party data, which allows you to connect with Snowflake customers to extend workflows with data services and third-party applications.

    There are many benefits to implementing Snowflake. It helps optimize costs, reduce downtime, improve operational efficiency, and automate data replication for fast recovery, and it is built for high reliability and availability.

      Below are quotes from interviews we conducted with users currently using the Snowflake solution:

      Sreenivasan R., Director of Data Architecture and Engineering at Decision Minds, says, "Data sharing is a good feature. It is a majorly used feature. The elastic computing is another big feature. Separating computing and storage gives you flexibility. It doesn't require much DBA involvement because it doesn't need any performance tuning. We are not doing any performance tuning, and the entire burden of performance and SQL tuning is on Snowflake. Its usability is very good. I don't need to ramp up any user, and its onboarding is easier. You just onboard the user, and you are done with it. There are simple SQL and UI, and people are able to use this solution easily. Ease of use is a big thing in Snowflake."

      A director of business operations at a logistics company mentions, "It requires no maintenance on our part. They handle all that. The speed is phenomenal. The pricing isn't really anything more than what you would be paying for a SQL server license or another tool to execute the same thing. We have zero maintenance on our side to do anything and the speed at which it performs queries and loads the data is amazing. It handles unstructured data extremely well, too. So, if the data is in a JSON array or an XML, it handles that super well."

      A Solution Architect at a wholesaler/distributor comments, "The ability to share the data and the ability to scale up and down easily are the most valuable features. The concept of data sharing and data plumbing made it very easy to provide and share data. The ability to refresh your Dev or QA just by doing a clone is also valuable. It has the dynamic scale up and scale down feature. Development and deployment are much easier as compared to other platforms where you have to go through a lot of stuff. With a tool like DBT, you can do modeling and transformation within a single tool and deploy to Snowflake. It provides continuous deployment and continuous integration abilities. There is a separation of storage and compute, so you only get charged for your usage. You only pay for what you use. When we share the data downstream with business partners, we can specifically create compute for them, and we can charge back the business."

      Sample Customers
      1. Adobe 2. BMW 3. Coca-Cola 4. General Electric 5. Johnson & Johnson 6. LinkedIn 7. Mastercard 8. Nestle 9. Pfizer 10. Samsung 11. Siemens 12. Toyota 13. Unilever 14. Verizon 15. Walmart 16. Accenture 17. American Express 18. AT&T 19. Bank of America 20. Cisco 21. Deloitte 22. ExxonMobil 23. Ford 24. General Motors 25. IBM 26. JPMorgan Chase 27. Microsoft (Azure Data Factory is developed by Microsoft) 28. Oracle 29. Procter & Gamble 30. Salesforce 31. Shell 32. Visa
      Accordant Media, Adobe, Kixeye Inc., Revana, SOASTA, White Ops
      Top Industries
      REVIEWERS
      Computer Software Company34%
      Insurance Company11%
      Manufacturing Company8%
      Financial Services Firm8%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Computer Software Company13%
      Financial Services Firm13%
      Manufacturing Company8%
      Healthcare Company7%
      REVIEWERS
      Computer Software Company30%
      Financial Services Firm20%
      Healthcare Company6%
      Manufacturing Company6%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Educational Organization27%
      Financial Services Firm13%
      Computer Software Company10%
      Manufacturing Company6%
      Company Size
      REVIEWERS
      Small Business29%
      Midsize Enterprise19%
      Large Enterprise52%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Small Business18%
      Midsize Enterprise13%
      Large Enterprise69%
      REVIEWERS
      Small Business26%
      Midsize Enterprise21%
      Large Enterprise54%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Small Business15%
      Midsize Enterprise34%
      Large Enterprise51%
      Buyer's Guide
      Azure Data Factory vs. Snowflake
      May 2024
      Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Data Factory vs. Snowflake and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
      771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.

      Azure Data Factory is ranked 3rd in Cloud Data Warehouse with 81 reviews while Snowflake is ranked 1st in Cloud Data Warehouse with 94 reviews. Azure Data Factory is rated 8.0, while Snowflake is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Azure Data Factory writes "The data factory agent is quite good but pricing needs to be more transparent". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Snowflake writes "Good usability, good data sharing and elastic compute features, and requires less DBA involvement". Azure Data Factory is most compared with Informatica PowerCenter, Informatica Cloud Data Integration, Alteryx Designer, IBM InfoSphere DataStage and Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics, whereas Snowflake is most compared with BigQuery, Teradata, Vertica, AWS Lake Formation and Amazon EMR. See our Azure Data Factory vs. Snowflake report.

      See our list of best Cloud Data Warehouse vendors.

      We monitor all Cloud Data Warehouse reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.