We performed a comparison between BeyondTrust Remote Support and Delinea Secret Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's very secure, and it works very well. I like their remote support feature. It can be used for our clients' desktops or anywhere where the client can be working. I'd have to say the product is very good. It's a strong solution for us."
"I would rate the technical support as a nine out of 10. They are polite, quick, and good with follow-ups."
"The most valuable feature of the solution concerns our company's main use case, which is for connection to our remote clients."
"The solution has been very stable. We haven't had issues at all. It doesn't crash or freeze. There aren't bugs or glitches either."
"This product "just works" (without fail) and is dead-easy for clients to connect with."
"Screen sharing, in general, is pretty important for a service desk. Another thing that I have found to be very helpful is that you can also do screen sharing on a cell phone. When people have an issue with their cell phone, it is ordinarily very difficult to troubleshoot the issue. With BeyondTrust Remote Support, you can share the cell phone screen, and somebody can take a look at it remotely. I am not sure if other competing solutions offer this feature. It is pretty user-friendly. It is also good performance-wise."
"The file transfer feature allows IT to provide needed drivers and files without interfering with the employee's workflow."
"Bomgar has given us the ability to manage the majority of our calls from a remote location making response times quicker and more efficient."
"The most valuable feature is session monitoring."
"Provides us with the ability to control access [to secrets] by groups."
"The secret template, password rotation, and recording sessions are the most valuable."
"I like that it is Windows-based. It is good that primarily, it is not an appliance. Some of the other applications in the space, such as a Quest Software CPAM or a Safeguard, are appliances, so you can't deploy the ends of them. With Thycotic, you can either install your Temporal Protection module physically in the VM host, or you can use BouncyCastle for high-security module capabilities."
"I like that it's user-friendly."
"Number one is the password vault; it's very good. Number two, they have a feature for remote desktops that are created on a per session basis, which is very good for security."
"The solution is scalable."
"The tool has many models. The tool also has a good cloud version. Also, the customers need not control any components on the solution side. The product's licensing model is also good since customers can choose a price that is most useful for them. The solution also supports password management for the users in your organization."
"The solution currently is not stable and we gave a road map of our expectations two or three days ago."
"We sometimes have trouble accessing servers because of credentialing and multifactor authentication issues with PAM."
"iOS interactive support would be a cool addition. Right now it's a non-interactive view."
"The chat needs to improve. We need to enable set hours for chat support which are separate from the remote support assistance."
"It could be more compatible with other applications. We had trouble with compatibility when it came to Entrust. This is because we had issues with Windows machines when we installed Entrust."
"I would also like to see better support of Apple devices while using a Windows remote support console."
"There were a few employee devices that failed during the initial deployment, which required a second deployment."
"It needs better Linux support. We have had issues with Ubuntu specifically."
"Although the password policy was interesting, the default setting was inadequate."
"The solution could be more user-friendly."
"Having more detailed reporting would improve this solution."
"They could improve the container platform and SPO."
"In terms of what could be improved, the whole thing with distributed engines, et cetera, is a little bit tricky."
"The technical support needs improvement. For example, if you have any problems on the server configuring the IIS, they would provide you very limited details and they would tell you the problem is on your end."
"Installation can sometimes be difficult, depending on the environment."
"When working with larger enterprises Thycotic Secret Server becomes a little cumbersome to work with because they do not allow as much flexibility as some of the other competitors, such as CyberArk. Thycotic Secret Server could improve by being more flexible when it comes to customization, and increase the number of API integrations."
BeyondTrust Remote Support is ranked 11th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 32 reviews while Delinea Secret Server is ranked 2nd in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 47 reviews. BeyondTrust Remote Support is rated 9.0, while Delinea Secret Server is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of BeyondTrust Remote Support writes "A robust, secure, and complete solution for quickly providing support and monitoring what's going on". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Delinea Secret Server writes "Effective for password rotation policies triggered by audit requirements, it helps maintain compliance standards and seamless integration with third-party tools ". BeyondTrust Remote Support is most compared with Microsoft Remote Desktop Services, TeamViewer, BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access, F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) and Microsoft Intune, whereas Delinea Secret Server is most compared with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Azure Key Vault, HashiCorp Vault, IBM Security Secret Server and ManageEngine PAM360. See our BeyondTrust Remote Support vs. Delinea Secret Server report.
See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.