We performed a comparison between BIC Platform and Camunda based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Design solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The product is easy to use."
"While this is a new product it has a mature feel from being built by a company with many years in the business."
"The central dictionary is a valuable feature."
"This is low-cost and very user friendly. A variety of models are available depending on the needs of the customer."
"It is an absolutely stable solution."
"One valuable feature of the solution is its flexibility."
"I think that the positives of Camunda Platform are that our customers can start with the free version. I think it is the most important."
"The solution is easily compatible with HTML forms and HTML language programming and that is the most significant part."
"The solution is good for data models."
"The modeler is useful for creating the flow. The way to access the data through their REST API is also valuable. This is what we're using right now."
"The graphical interface is very beneficial."
"The number of client implementations and cross-language capabilities to support multiple frameworks is very pluggable compared to Pega. It's also more portable."
"There's an issue with the current manual that they're working on."
"The solution could improve its connectivity to other systems."
"The product needs improvement regarding the confidentiality of the domain information for the key administrator."
"As the product is very new, some minor features are still missing, but everything is there to handle day-to-day process modeling."
"When addressing a complex and extensive process, the domain it belongs to, be it banking, healthcare, or HR, requires widespread access."
"It would be better if the tool were made less reliant on Java."
"It lacks some preset features and configurations which would make it more plug-and-play for customers."
"The product does not have a dictionary."
"The cockpit features of the Camunda Platform can be improved to make it a bit more user-friendly, in terms of providing a bit more user experience for non-technical users. There could be some additional documentation added."
"The solution could use some enhancements like adding connectors, improving forms and having a mobile app, but everything is an enhancement rather than a flaw."
"I would like to see the forms engine available in the open-source version of this solution."
"The latency of API could be decreased."
BIC Platform is ranked 18th in Business Process Design with 4 reviews while Camunda is ranked 2nd in Business Process Design with 71 reviews. BIC Platform is rated 8.2, while Camunda is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of BIC Platform writes "Provides good stability, but they should add a feature for enterprise architecture". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". BIC Platform is most compared with SAP Signavio Process Manager, ARIS BPA, Visio, ADONIS and ARIS Cloud, whereas Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian. See our BIC Platform vs. Camunda report.
See our list of best Business Process Design vendors and best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
