We performed a comparison between Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security and Juniper vSRX based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Virtualization Security solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."You will always have a backup copy of any policy the Bitdefender user defines."
"The features I found most valuable in Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security include anti-malware, spyware detection, firewall, network detection, and user behavior analytics. The solution also gives you a heads-up about operating system misconfiguration."
"It is very easy to configure and deploy."
"The most valuable features of Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security are remote administration and deployment, comprehensive firewall protection, malware protection, and antivirus."
"I find Bitdefender to be very light. When we were using the other versions, users would complain that they would make the computers slow. But since we have deployed Bitdefender, we haven't had that."
"I like its unified interface, which also helps you scan Outlook email, for example. Multiple products can be standardized across endpoints or the EDR solution, and the integrations with SIEMs."
"It takes lesser energy from the system than the rest. So, we tried it for five years, and it works quite well. So we have continued with it. And the pricing is competitive as well."
"We find the protection the solution provides valuable."
"It's much faster to deploy a power source. If you need to deploy a firewall in the cloud of software, it's much easier and much faster than deploying the office firewall in a rush."
"The tool's most valuable features are routing features and service quality."
"The initial setup was very straightforward. There was no problem. The initial deployment took about one hour."
"The technical support services are excellent."
"The most valuable features are application filtering, content filtering, the intrusion prevention system (IPS), and definitely the application firewall."
"The technical support has been good."
"The authentication part is seamless and easy for people."
"Juniper is more flexible with the commit check and the commit confirmed command. The design of the forwarding and contract plan in the operating system is very important for the performance when we have very big traffic."
"The solution's stability could be better."
"The security features as per customers' requirements should be improved."
"They've got all this training that's available, but it involves stuff that doesn't really encompass the solution as a whole."
"The firewall capabilities could benefit from an upgrade since it lacks a high level of granularity and control."
"Overall, Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security is quite good. It always has new features which customers can use for free, so I can't say that something is missing in the solution, though one area for improvement is that the cloud version of Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security still can't connect to a central SIEM. The on-premises version has that capability, but the cloud version doesn't."
"The dashboard can be improved."
"The connection with the controller needs improvement. Some connections are currently unstable."
"There is room for improvement in CPU utilization."
"The tool's basic license does not cover everything. It needs to improve visibility and availability."
"Some people complain that the solution tends to have a steep learning curve. It could be because most people have basic familiarity with Cisco or other similar products and maybe have never worked closely with Juniper products."
"They could provide support for cloud deployments."
"It could use more tutorials."
"The GUI interface needs improvement."
"I would like to see an activity sensor for malicious content or sensor for viruses and malware."
"The solution could improve its technical support."
"The solution's GUI needs improvement."
More Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security is ranked 4th in Virtualization Security with 23 reviews while Juniper vSRX is ranked 3rd in Virtualization Security with 33 reviews. Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security is rated 8.2, while Juniper vSRX is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security writes "Gives a good snapshot of what's going on". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Juniper vSRX writes "Fast with good usability and fairly scalable". Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security is most compared with HP Wolf Security, ESET Endpoint Protection Platform, Seqrite Endpoint Security, Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business and Trend Vision One Endpoint Security, whereas Juniper vSRX is most compared with Juniper SRX Series Firewall, Azure Firewall, Meraki MX, Cisco Secure Firewall and OPNsense. See our Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. Juniper vSRX report.
See our list of best Virtualization Security vendors.
We monitor all Virtualization Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
