We performed a comparison between Blackberry UEM and Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, VMware, ManageEngine and others in Unified Endpoint Management (UEM)."The standout features of Intune are its excellent mobile device management and highly effective application management capabilities."
"Its protection policies are most valuable. It protects mobile devices as well as individual apps. It is pretty scalable, and its documentation is also pretty good. It is also pretty straightforward to deploy."
"Technical support, in general, has been quite helpful."
"One of the most valuable aspects of Microsoft Intune is its seamless integration with Azure Active Directory, offering capabilities akin to Group Policy Objects."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Intune is having all our devices compliant with our policies."
"The reporting and analytics features in Microsoft Intune have been a lifesaver."
"It provides control over all mobile devices that are being connected to the corporate network."
"It works well if you have a Microsoft environment."
"The solution has a lot of features, such as adding different applications and devices to one platform. This allowed us to manage many devices and applications from a single platform."
"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks should be a stable solution."
"It collects and caches and the knowledge of machine learning from different customers to take to the cloud. It makes it better to use for everybody. It allows for quick learning and updates and can, therefore, offer zero-day malware security. This sharing of metadata helps make the solution very safe."
"WildFire AI is the best option for this product."
"This software helps us understand any issues that may arise when someone is not at work."
"The solution allows control over the user and his machine through Cortex XDR security policies."
"The one feature of Palo Alto Networks Traps that our organization finds most valuable is the App ID service."
"Stability is one of the features we like the most."
"Traps is quite a stable product. Once it was properly deployed and configured, you have nothing to be worried about."
"The solution requires Mac support."
"Regarding mobile devices, Intune is good, but there are other services that I would say are ahead of Intune from an administration and reporting point of view."
"Sometimes, updating a client policy is very difficult. This needs to be improved."
"The Mac integration has room for improvement."
"They need to integrate more with security options."
"They should improve its compatibility with other operating systems such as iOS and Linux. It supports Linux but they still need to work on the iOS part."
"In the past, I raised some tickets for the enhancement feature, which was missing in Intune."
"Reporting could be improved. It needs to be more expensive and robust."
"The solution is complicated for new users. There are a lot of buttons on the first page. It can be very confusing if you’re not aware of the terms they use. For example, a button labelled ‘edit device’ doesn't explain exactly what it does or how to use it."
"The playbooks could be improved to include more functionalities or actions."
"There is a severe gap in functionality between Windows, Linux, and Mac versions. For example all folder restriction settings are Windows only. Traps 5.0+ does not have SAML / LDAP integration."
"In the next release, I would like to see more UI improvements. Their UI is a bit basic. When we are speaking about Palo Alto Networks they are the big company, so they can improve the UI a little bit. The UI, the reports, the log system can all be improved."
"The solution should offer more dashboards and they should be better customized."
"I don't like that they have different types of licenses. For example, if users select a license, they think they will have all the platforms they need to improve their network or security. But after some time, Palo Alto Networks changed their licensing, and some of the features that, for example, were free at the beginning now have a cost. I think the integration can be improved. For example, a lot of tools are just integrated through APIs."
"It'll help if customization was easier."
"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks could improve by adding a sandbox feature to better compete with their competitors which have it."
"Limited remote connection."
More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Pricing and Cost Advice →
Blackberry UEM is ranked 14th in Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) with 1 review while Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is ranked 4th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 80 reviews. Blackberry UEM is rated 7.0, while Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Blackberry UEM writes " An affordable solution to control BlackBerry applications but has latency issues ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks writes "Perfect correlation and XDR capabilities for network traffic plus endpoint security". Blackberry UEM is most compared with Blackberry Dynamics Apps, whereas Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Darktrace, Symantec Endpoint Security and Fortinet FortiEDR.
We monitor all Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.