We performed a comparison between BMC Helix ITSM and Freshdesk based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Help Desk Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The Helix chatbot is helpful, and we can use its workflow features to automate some of the use cases for our clients."
"The way you can customize this product to adapt to the process the customer is already using is what sets this apart from other ITSM products out there. This helps customers to adapt to the tool pretty quickly."
"It has the power to automatize several different tasks in the ITSM world."
"Customer support is always fantastic and willing to help. No matter what time of day we have a problem."
"Smart IT and the phone app are easily the most valuable features in reporting and tracking ongoing issues."
"The valuable feature for me is that it's a tool that allows me to track processes right from the initial user request."
"The most valuable features of BMC Helix ITSM are the service level management, configuration, and reporting tool."
"It's one of the top solutions on the market for ITSM capabilities."
"It's easy to use and integrates with other tools. We can embed Jira into it, link Jira tickets with Freshdesk tickets, and use it for our knowledge base."
"Technical support is outstanding."
"The organization that is possible with other departments is the solution's most valuable aspect."
"The feature that I have found most valuable is the way that it connects to various folders especially because we use it as a CRM tool. We can connect it with our phones and our chat, and also with the API and have it as an email service. Freshdesk just makes our life easier."
"It generated reports for us, which helped us identify the status of requests and the aging of requests."
"Omnichannel is one of the most valuable features of the solution."
"Its simplicity is most valuable. It is easy and simple, and it requires negligible training effort. I don't spend all my time goofing around trying to find stuff in the ticketing system."
"It is very easy to make reports."
"Needs to make customizable/configurable article templates in the Knowledge Management."
"Needs less infrastructure requirements."
"Compared to ServiceNow, BMC Remedy is somewhat "closed." I can go to the ServiceNow website and learn everything there is to know about the product, and training is available. That really wasn't available with BMC Remedy."
"The interface isn't that great."
"The search feature and the dashboard could both be improved."
"Maybe it could be more simplified and easier to change the reporting point of view, like from a different vendor to another."
"The tool needs greater customization flexibility, particularly concerning notifications and the progressive view web page. This is significant because it encompasses various aspects like incident management, problem management, change management, work orders, and tasks. Aligning the GUI interface with these functionalities requires more flexibility."
"Encountered issues with scalability and stability."
"While it's good for a small number of tickets, definitely in the future, we will require something more powerful."
"Having so many tags makes everyday work a lot more complicated, and a lot more time-consuming."
"We have many cases where a ticket comes in, and it ends up having multiple team members working on it. It would be really nice to be able to assign a single ticket to multiple people, rather than having to create the parent-child hierarchy that they have set up. It generates a proliferation of tickets that I really don't want to have. Having to jump from a parent to one child and then to another child makes it harder for me to be able to see the entire case from end to end. A simple example is our new hire process or our termination process. We have people who leave. We also have people who come on board. We have got multiple people participating and doing things related to the leaving or onboarding process. Currently, I have to go to different tickets to be able to see whether all tasks are really done or not. If I could assign lots of people to one ticket, it would be really nice."
"The reporting, analysis modules and insights capabilities for this solution could be improved."
"There are some restrictions where you need automation and sometimes there is just no way to achieve what you need."
"I would like to see improvements in the account management aspect, having a customer portal for better visibility into my subscription, invoices, and trouble tickets."
"Freshdesk could improve its capabilities. It's missing the article formatting, and the overall look and feel make it not easy to use. The administration instructions on how to manage the automation, capability, and integration with third parties, such as chat or bots, are very important in these types of solutions."
"For integrations, we need to write code that communicates with their system in order to enable certain functionality in the system. This is a lot of work for their customers."
BMC Helix ITSM is ranked 3rd in Help Desk Software with 75 reviews while Freshdesk is ranked 9th in Help Desk Software with 27 reviews. BMC Helix ITSM is rated 8.0, while Freshdesk is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of BMC Helix ITSM writes "The leading service management platform for delivering intelligent, user-centric experiences". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Freshdesk writes "Incredibly user-friendly, flexible, and affordable". BMC Helix ITSM is most compared with ServiceNow, JIRA Service Management, ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus, IBM Maximo and Zendesk, whereas Freshdesk is most compared with JIRA Service Management, ServiceNow, Microsoft Dynamics CRM, Spiceworks and Atlassian Confluence. See our BMC Helix ITSM vs. Freshdesk report.
See our list of best Help Desk Software vendors.
We monitor all Help Desk Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.