We performed a comparison between Brinqa and Tenable Nessus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7 and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management."The most valuable features of Brinqa are its data integration capabilities."
"Once you get past the initial implementation, the solution is very stable."
"We looked at Tenable, Qualys and Rapid7. We found Tenable was the best of all three."
"I like its ease of use. It has the script that is pre-built in it, and you just got to know which ones you're looking for."
"Nessus is good at finding out what nodes you have in place. It will then provide you a report, by node, of what the vulnerabilities are. It does it quickly and stealthfully."
"The automatic scanner and scheduler are pretty cool."
"I have experience with it on my attack stations, and it's pretty good to optimize. Personally, I think Nessus is quite a good product."
"The solution is great for scanning servers."
"The most valuable feature is how it scanned and detected through its database to let us know exactly what fixes we needed to put in place for the vulnerabilities. It detects and it also gives you the way to fix it."
"Brinqa could improve in terms of the speed of their service and resource provision."
"Model OS costs (and its segregation schema for individual modules)."
"Nessus' reporting could be more user-friendly."
"We have had some false positives in the past, which we hope can improve in the future."
"The reports are okay, but the interface is a bit difficult to navigate in some cases."
"I would like to have a management option after the network scanning."
"We use credentialed scans. They need more permissions and more changes or settings on Windows and Linux."
"The reporting could be improved. The reporting in Rapid7 is much better."
"In terms of what could be improved, I would say its reporting portion."
Brinqa is ranked 14th in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 1 review while Tenable Nessus is ranked 3rd in Vulnerability Management with 75 reviews. Brinqa is rated 7.0, while Tenable Nessus is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Brinqa writes "Allows us to configure the risk algorithm to suit our specific needs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Nessus writes "Unlimited assets for one price and quick, agentless results". Brinqa is most compared with Vulcan Cyber, Axonius, Avalor, Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) and Wiz, whereas Tenable Nessus is most compared with Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Vulnerability Management, Tenable Security Center and Pentera.
We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.