Broadcom Clarity vs JIRA Portfolio comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Broadcom Clarity
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
138
Ranking in other categories
Project Portfolio Management (2nd), Project Management Software (8th)
JIRA Portfolio
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
55
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (4th)
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Project Management Software category, the market share of Broadcom Clarity is 5.1% and it increased by 52.1% compared to the previous year. The market share of JIRA Portfolio is 1.1% and it decreased by 37.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Project Management Software
Unique Categories:
Project Portfolio Management
11.3%
Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
1.1%
 

Featured Reviews

Lowell Wetzel - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 24, 2022
A dynamic solution with a lot of great out-of-the-box calculations, but integration with reporting utilities is a bit painful
One of the things that have always been a bit painful is the integration with reporting utilities. The current integration is with Jaspersoft, and there are a number of difficulties with that. If you're using out-of-the-box fields and everything, it is a bit slow and clunky. It has a drag-and-drop interface for the users. On the backend side, there is a report designer. They haven't given or allowed me any training on it yet. So, it has been a bit limited in its features. On one of the earlier report utilities, they had one called Actuate, which had VBA as its base programming language, and you could do quite dynamic things behind the scenes, whereas the Jaspersoft interface seems rather locked. So, you're limited in your options. Being a programmer, you like to have room to be able to invent and create rather than just being limited to a few selection boxes.
Yantao Zhao - PeerSpot reviewer
May 9, 2024
Provides the most functions and very efficient for internal communication
Everyone mentions tasks using JIRA. It is used for various everyday tasks, including dashboards, sprints, backlogs, and workloads It has been very efficient for internal communication and managing different data and work projects. It tracks the progress, the development, and more.  It is one of…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Broadcom Clarity PPM's most valuable feature is the plenty of modules, such as portfolio, project, resource, and time."
"The dynamism of the application where you can modify it to fit your needs is valuable. For example, you can create fields, metrics, and measures on the fly. You don't have to be limited to what the out-of-the-box format would be. It allows you to generate fields, metrics, and reports off of that with relative ease."
"​It is very intuitive. Even if you do not have training documents or anything, you can start feeling your way around pretty easily."
"With the new UI, CA is heading in the right direction, and fast. They're adding features, I would say major features, two times a year, which is fast. They're adding features, I would say major features, two times a year, which is fast."
"Absolutely, the most active community I have ever been on."
"There were probably about five or six metrics that we used. As a result, the groups that I supported were consistently ranked at the absolute top of the organization, as we were leveraging these built-in tools for tracking."
"It's very good out of the box, without configurations required."
"Allows us to track all of a project's elements in one database."
"The customized workflows we can define are very valuable. JIRA's private projects is very useful as well. There are also a lot of plugins that they provide."
"The solution includes good and fast notifications for other project team members."
"It is a good scalable solution that I have used for small projects and reasonably large projects."
"JIRA has helped us reduce the rate of unseen or undetectable issues in the future. It has also helped us understand the demand overload across the defense team, including capacity and availability, and how we can leverage different teams to ensure overall success."
"I use it to plan and schedule the things I take care of. I can create and share a document if I want to discuss new ideas with my team remotely."
"Has many functionalities including good supervision and workflows."
"The workflow and bucket features are most helpful."
"The way to manage cards as a KANBAN, is really easy but when you need to track hundreds of projects, you need to be very clear in which way the things must be completed."
 

Cons

"It should be integrated with CA Service Desk Manager so that, when you have time for a ticket or when someone gets assigned a ticket, in PPM it automatically shows that they have to account for that: that they would both enter time in the past and, also, that this is going to take them time in the future."
"There is a lack of seamless integration with industry standard products."
"We use a product called TFS and we would definitely like to see integration with that. It's not there right now. Agile Central is the one that is integrated with."
"They need something so that if we, say, send some sheets to users, or for the scenario where not everybody has access to Clarity, but are part of planning; those people should be able to upload data directly to Clarity."
"I think there's still a little bit of opportunity that we can do some stuff better in relation to the financial part of it; just that easier integration, that look and feel. Our project managers, and obviously finance people, love to interface and use of Excel. The more we can get CA PPM to behave in a similar way, which we're already starting to gain in that path, will be absolutely fantastic."
"I would like to see more team-based management, and less people-based management; as far as the resource management goes, to do it per team and not per person."
"Portfolio Management Solution for Project Strategizing" What is our primary use case? It is mainly used for project management, developing the portfolio of the project and the budget process of all projects. What is most valuable? For a very long time, Broadcom Clarity had not developed the old interface that Broadcom no and we were not able to see any new features on the system because of the older UEX. We switched to the new UX at the end of March and it needs some time for the user to react to the new features. But if overall main features are being talked about, the financial part of Clarity is really appreciated. What needs improvement? Among things to be improved, Clarity can really work on its SAP interface. The current interface lacks out-of-the-box connectors for different applicators in the system. Therefore, this requires external support, which is beyond our expertise. In-house development is done for the interface, but as the system becomes complex, there is a building need to maintain the necessity of updates. If the updates aren’t maintained, then the system might be compatible. Additionally, the report generation process using a different software poses difficulties, leading to the need for external consultancy to create specific reports. Certain features, also face compatibility issues with our existing system. Despite these limitations, we find the system satisfactory overall, although a learning curve exists, especially for those unfamiliar with its particularities."
"We see it as overhead. Let us collect all the data in one place. Which, it is always nice to have everything in one place, but it does cause that overhead."
"Some key features like integration, big data warehousing and data modeling need work."
"The solution’s pricing could be reduced."
"The interface JIRA Portfolio could improve."
"n the next version I would like to see better reporting and safer plugins, as well as easier scalability."
"When I want to embed Jira Portfolio in a complete HLI cycle, I'm missing things to evaluate my ethic into my value stream."
"Another thing could be to have an easy way to manage the Portfolio and have more ways to share and to show graphics and reports"
"I think their view needs to be more user friendly. The UI makes it difficult to find things. Secondly, the configuration is very complex. JIRA should help people find out what configuration they are using."
"As there are no perfect solutions and considering that I rate JIRA Portfolio's stability an eight out of ten, I feel it is an area with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Cost-wise, the tool is very expensive and some tools might be able to cater to 80% of the functionality provided by Broadcom Clarity PPM but are not as expensive."
"The price point of Broadcom Clarity PPM is less than Planisware. If a customer comes to me, and the cost is the main parameter for the selection of a tool, then I'll recommend Broadcom because cost-wise, they are less than other solutions."
"The licensing costs are a little bit high, and unfortunately, it has been a while since I've had that paperwork in front of me. I don't remember how much it was, but it seemed like it was fairly high. It is probably comparable to some of the other solutions because I do know that, for example, on a lot of the AWS stuff, they found that the costs wound up being higher than having some on-prem solution. Comparatively, Clarity is within the price range of other solutions."
"The price of Broadcom Clarity PPM is reasonable. My customers pay a license to use this solution on an annual basis."
"For all the functionalities of the solution, the price is in the market range, since it is a product which offers governance issues and supports the digital transformation, which is where we will go in the next year."
"It is a little bit costly compared to others, but it is mature. Customer should understand this product is geared towards project management, not financial management."
"Better understanding of requirements and how it will be implemented (with number of licenses for a given budget) would help."
"There are different licensing models with Broadcom Clarity PPM. With the software as a service model, you pay as you go, and if you are on-premises, you can buy a perpetual license and an annual fee for maintenance."
"We have a license to use JIRA Portfolio, we are not using the free version."
"The pricing of the solution is expensive."
"I rate JIRA Portfolio a five out of ten for its pricing."
"The product is really not very expensive."
"This solution has a comparable pricing in comparison to other similar products on the market."
"We only have nine people using it so we have a standard cost of $150 dollar per year. There are only additional costs if you exceed the limit of users, then you start paying by user. The cost is significantly higher."
"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing a six."
"Portfolio is very expensive, costing on average $2000-3000 per user per month."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Management Software solutions are best for your needs.
787,226 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
62%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Government
5%
Manufacturing Company
4%
Financial Services Firm
21%
Computer Software Company
16%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Insurance Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What is your primary use case for Broadcom Clarity PPM?
The solution can be used for strategic planning. It is also used for portfolio and project management.
What do you like most about JIRA Portfolio?
The solution's tracking capabilities helped ensure we had full visibility into planned work and scheduled work.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JIRA Portfolio?
I do not believe that the product provides value for money since I feel that it is quite expensive. I don't have a clear view of the cost associated with the licensing part of the tool. The product...
What needs improvement with JIRA Portfolio?
From an improvement perspective, I would like to see the product of more integration capabilities with different platforms. The APIs work, but what my company noticed is that Atlassian offers exten...
 

Also Known As

Clarity PPM, CA Clarity, CA PPM, CA Clarity PPM
Portfolio for JIRA
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Toyota Financial Services, GameStop, Polycom, Sky, Qantas, Cox Enterprises, Banco Mercantil, Borealis
Rosetta Stone, Sprint, UBS, Workday, Expedia, J.P. Morgan
Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom Clarity vs. JIRA Portfolio and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
787,226 professionals have used our research since 2012.