We performed a comparison between BrowserStack and TestProject based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools."The setup was quite simple. The website easily explains how to set it up and if you want to integrate it with BMP tools there are online simple step tutorials."
"The speed of the solution and its performance are valuable."
"The most valuable feature is the variety the solution offers around the different types of devices, especially mobile devices."
"I like that it offers full device capability."
"The most valuable feature is that it provides parallel and cross-browser testing. It enables us to run tests on multiple browsers or devices simultaneously."
"Local testing for products with no public exposure is an advantage in development."
"It is a stable solution. There's no lagging and jittering."
"It is a scalable solution."
"The ease of web and mobile functional testing is pretty easy on TestProject."
"The automation and AI are very good."
"The script-less part of it was good for novice users."
"Since implementing this solution, our code management has been reduced by 40% to 60%."
"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
"Ability to carry out automatic testing without having coding knowledge."
"I would like to see clearer visibility."
"BrowserStack operates at a slow pace, it could improve by making it faster."
"We are having difficulty with the payment system for the BrowserStack team, as they only accept credit cards and we are encountering some issues."
"We are struggling to do local testing."
"I would like for there to be more integration with BrowserStack and other platforms."
"Occasionally, there are disruptions in the connection which can interfere with our testing processes, especially when testing on phones."
"While I was testing I was not 100% sure a that was properly mimicking the browsers or not. We had some issues with a browser, and the reason was the browser itself does not provide any support. If the local system does not provide any support, I think this was the problem. There should be better integration with other solutions, such as JIRA."
"We had some execution issues."
"In an upcoming release, there should be a SaaS offering available."
"I and some other experts may be able to understand the solution's reporting system, but a layperson won't understand it."
"The support is a weak point since they discontinued the tool."
"TestProject needs better support for integration with other products to provide a better overall solution for test planning and test data management."
"Difficult trying to configure on more than one browser."
"We'd like to see a direct cloud from TestProject instead of some other third party."
BrowserStack is ranked 4th in Functional Testing Tools with 25 reviews while TestProject is ranked 17th in Test Automation Tools with 6 reviews. BrowserStack is rated 8.0, while TestProject is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of BrowserStack writes "Good in the area of automation and offers a high test coverage to users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TestProject writes "An easy-to-use tool that saves time and functions within a limited budget". BrowserStack is most compared with LambdaTest, Sauce Labs, Perfecto, Tricentis Tosca and CrossBrowserTesting, whereas TestProject is most compared with Katalon Studio, Tricentis Tosca and Testim.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
