We performed a comparison between Camunda and Ultimus Adaptive Business Process Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Being able to use a Java-based solution makes the product flexible."
"Provides an easy way to integrate with the architectural environment."
"Using the BPMN helps us to have a common shared communication language when discussing processes."
"It has an open BPM"
"We can easily define and deploy business processes. Camunda provides the tools that allow business people to design business processes. We don't have to have developers for it. It is so easy to use that our business people can go into the tool and model their business processes. We get time to do other things than just designing business processes."
"The integration with almost any language, product, and even human tasks, is valuable. It's very seamless to integrate into existing systems. It doesn't require you to rewrite a lot of your existing system. That's where it really stands out."
"Its flexibility stands out as the most valuable feature."
"Camunda's most valuable feature is its ability to integrate with different products."
"Development is easy on the Ultimus platform."
"Ultimus Adaptive Business Process Management has good integration with all the other tools we have been using in our company. We use the data that other tools provide in our implementation."
"Especially when you use the open-source version, there are issues with performance."
"In the future, I would like to see better transactional integrity."
"Would be helpful if there were additional out-of-the-box activities."
"I think that Camunda can try to do better when it comes to solving the complexities of all the products in its software stack."
"I'm from the .NET world and I would like to use it, rather than Java."
"Community support is basically what I'm looking for. Other than that, it is okay for now."
"I don't like the UI of the Camunda Platform, I have found the Signavio solution to be much better for me to create the process designs and execute them. Additionally, I have found the tools in the Camunda Platform are not compatible with some of my other tools. They should improve this in the future."
"I would say that Camunda should actually focus on small cases as well. There's a lot of space out there, for small businesses. If they can, they should cater to them."
"We are looking for a feature that can resign and move the process from one step to another step."
"Ultimus is not good at handling cash transactions. They should add a mobile application in the next release."
More Ultimus Adaptive Business Process Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 69 reviews while Ultimus Adaptive Business Process Management is ranked 52nd in Business Process Management (BPM). Camunda is rated 8.2, while Ultimus Adaptive Business Process Management is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ultimus Adaptive Business Process Management writes "Integrates well and helpful support". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas Ultimus Adaptive Business Process Management is most compared with Appian. See our Camunda vs. Ultimus Adaptive Business Process Management report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
