We performed a comparison between Camunda and WorkflowGen based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Design solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is a scalable product. I would rate the scalability a ten out of ten."
"I've found the active community most valuable but it also provides you with a lot of other features."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to share the logic within the rules engine with the business, so you can put it up for everybody to read."
"The most valuable features are the workflow, the task list, and the modeler where we use VPN."
"The ease with which I can define workflows is most valuable. The latest updates and flexibility that it provides around a task activity are interesting for me."
"It is open-source. It supports microservice orchestration. This is what we are really interested in. We can customize our products depending on the use cases."
"We have the ability to modify the product if we need to, and that comes in handy whenever we need to add new functionality and features."
"The architecture is good because it's a headless workflow. I can create my own frontend, and it's fully API-based."
"We use it a lot for creating workflows to transfer materials between plants, which is a signature part of what we do."
"As we experienced some difficulties in the beginning, deployment took almost a month."
"In the latest version, there are certain workflow nodes that are missing. Camunda should bring those back, or rather, develop them quickly."
"If there were some industry templates it would have helped significantly, because it is similar to a process map for a domain. That is what we are currently creating, a domain-relevant process map."
"The cockpit features of the Camunda Platform can be improved to make it a bit more user-friendly, in terms of providing a bit more user experience for non-technical users. There could be some additional documentation added."
"It would be helpful to have more readily available use cases on the internet. Camunda's documentation feels less comprehensive."
"Would be helpful if there were additional out-of-the-box activities."
"In terms of features, it meets my needs, but I would like Camunda to have an office in Brazil and provide training in Portuguese. They should provide regional support and training courses in Portuguese."
"It would be better if the tool were made less reliant on Java."
"This solution needs to be more customizable."
Earn 20 points
Camunda is ranked 2nd in Business Process Design with 71 reviews while WorkflowGen is ranked 28th in Business Process Design. Camunda is rated 8.2, while WorkflowGen is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WorkflowGen writes "Good for automatically triggering workflows, but needs to be more customizable". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas WorkflowGen is most compared with . See our Camunda vs. WorkflowGen report.
See our list of best Business Process Design vendors, best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors, and best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
