We performed a comparison between Cassandra and Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two NoSQL Databases solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable features are the counter features and the NoSQL schema. It also has good scalability. You can scale Cassandra to any finite level."
"Our primary use case for the solution is testing."
"The most valuable feature of Cassandra is its fast retrieval. Additionally, the solution can handle large amounts of data. It is the quickest application we use."
"Can achieve continuous data without a single downtime because of node to node ring architecture."
"The use of Cassandra in real-time data analytics has been pivotal for our e-commerce platform. As our platform operates 24/7, providing services to sellers and customers alike, the need for real-time updates is paramount."
"The most valuable features of Cassandra are the NoSQL database, high performance, and zero-copy streaming."
"I am satisfied with the performance."
"Cassandra is good. It's better than CouchDB, and we are using it in parallel with CouchDB. Cassandra looks better and is more user-friendly."
"We had a data warehouse before all the data. We can process a lot more data structures."
"Provides a viable open-source solution for enterprise implementations and reliable, intelligent data analysis."
"The product is completely secure."
"We're now able to store large volumes of data through Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop. We're able to push large volumes of data to the platform, and that used to be a challenge, especially when storing a terabyte of information. This is the area where Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop improved the organization."
"The solution is stable."
"The most valuable feature is that I can use CDH for almost all use cases across all industries, including the financial sector, public sector, private retailers, and so on."
"The most valuable feature is Kubernetes."
"The main advantage is the storage is less expensive."
"It can be difficult to analyze what's going on inside of the database relative to other databases. It can also be difficult to troubleshoot sometimes."
"Fine-tuning was a bit of a challenge."
"Depending upon our schema, we can't make ORDER BY or GROUP BY clauses in the product."
"There could be more integration, and it could be more user-friendly."
"There were challenges with the query language and the development interface. The query language, in particular, could be improved for better optimization. These challenges were encountered while using the Java SDK."
"The disc space is lacking. You need to free it up as you are working."
"Cassandra can improve by adding more built-in tools. For example, if you want to do some maintenance activities in the cluster, we have to depend on third-party tools. Having these tools build-in would be e benefit."
"The secondary index in Cassandra was a bit problematic and could be improved."
"Cloudera's support is extremely bad and cannot be relied on."
"Currently, we are using many other tools such as Spark and Blade Job to improve the performance."
"Without the big data environment, we cannot store all of this data live. We have billions of records and terabytes of storage to be used. It's not an option actually for us to have a big data environment."
"The governance aspect of the solution should be improved."
"They should focus on upgrading their technical capabilities in the market."
"The procedure for operations could be simplified."
"The Cloudera training has deteriorated significantly."
"Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is not always completely stable in some cases, which can be a concern for big data solutions."
More Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cassandra is ranked 4th in NoSQL Databases with 19 reviews while Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is ranked 5th in NoSQL Databases with 47 reviews. Cassandra is rated 8.0, while Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cassandra writes "Well-equipped to handle a massive influx of data and billions of requests". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop writes "Good end-to-end security features and we like that it's cloud independent". Cassandra is most compared with Couchbase, MongoDB, InfluxDB, ScyllaDB and Apache HBase, whereas Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is most compared with Amazon EMR, HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric, Apache Spark, MongoDB and ScyllaDB. See our Cassandra vs. Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop report.
See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.
We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
