We compared Cato Networks and Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform based on our users reviews in five parameters. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:
Comparison Results: After evaluating user reviews, it is evident that both Cato Networks and Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform have received positive reviews. Cato Networks is appreciated for its simple installation process and valuable features, while Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform is highly regarded for its strong security measures, user-friendly interface, and extensive control options. Cato Networks stands out for its quick and efficient setup, whereas Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform shines in terms of comprehensive security measures and ease of use. However, some users mention that managing remote sites can be time-consuming with Cato Networks, and there may be intermittent performance issues and a learning curve for beginners in zero trust models with Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform. It is worth mentioning that both products offer excellent customer service and support.
"The visibility control and security aspects are amazing."
"The product is efficient and easy to use."
"We appreciate the optimization and acceleration of the performance of SDP users."
"The solution is a simple WAN solution. We've onboarded the socket on the Cato platform, and it provides connectivity. There is no complex routing."
"Cato offers all the functionality found in other solution. The life cycle management is always very stable."
"The most valuable feature of Cato Networks is the CASB and the documentation is useful."
"It is a stable solution...it is a scalable solution."
"When I first encountered Cato, I didn't know how to use it, but after a week of training, I could onboard our systems to it, so the solution was easy to learn and navigate."
"Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform removes the risk of exposing the applications to the public."
"The tool needs to be more granular. Its reports are not very in-depth."
"I am located in South Korea, and I can say that most people here have no idea about Cato Networks. I think Cato Networks should promote its network services in various countries."
"Its functionality is a bit limited in some areas as compared to a Cisco solution. It is not as granular. It doesn't have the manageability, feature set, and capabilities of a larger or an enterprise-level solution. It just needs a more robust feature set and granularity."
"I would like to see better integration with identity providers."
"They should add more sophisticated security features. It should also be integrated into the cloud."
"The price could be better."
"The solution is not cheap."
"Cato Networks security could be better."
"Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform needs to improve its documentation. It took time to do the implementation."
More Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cato SASE Cloud Platform is ranked 4th in ZTNA as a Service with 21 reviews while Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform is ranked 15th in ZTNA as a Service with 1 review. Cato SASE Cloud Platform is rated 8.8, while Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Cato SASE Cloud Platform writes "Useful remote worker VPN, centralized management, and simple on-boarding process". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform writes "Helps to secure applications from public but needs improvement in documentation ". Cato SASE Cloud Platform is most compared with Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange, Cisco SD-WAN, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, Fortinet FortiGate and VMware SD-WAN, whereas Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform is most compared with Twingate and Axis Security.
See our list of best ZTNA as a Service vendors.
We monitor all ZTNA as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.