CentOS vs Windows Server comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
CentOS Logo
13,383 views|13,273 comparisons
98% willing to recommend
Microsoft Logo
18,920 views|14,310 comparisons
94% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary
Updated on Oct 30, 2022

We performed a comparison between CentOS and Windows Server based on our users’ reviews in four categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.

  • Ease of Deployment: Users of both solutions say deployment is easy.
  • Features: Users of both products are happy with their stability and scalability.

    CentOS users like the solution’s ease of use and intuitive UI and say it is robust. Reviewers would like to see improved security, additional coding tools, and better integration.

    Windows Server users like the Active Directory tool and say the solution performs well. Users mention that the solution’s security needs to be improved.
  • Pricing: CentOS is a community-driven free software solution. Most Windows Server reviewers feel that it is an expensive product.
  • Service and Support: CentOS’s support is community-based. Users relate that the knowledge base is very trustworthy and it is very easy to get issues resolved quickly. Windows Server users have mixed reviews for the product’s support.

Comparison Results: In this comparison, CentOS has a slight edge over Windows Server because it is free whereas Windows Server is considered expensive. Users also favor the technical support they receive from CentOS.

To learn more, read our detailed CentOS vs. Windows Server Report (Updated: March 2024).
772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"I like its stability, performance, and usability.""It is better than Ubuntu Linux.""The latest version of this solution has everything built in, making it comprehensive and very easy to use.""It is a stable soultion.""The pricing is good. We pay a minimal fee.""It’s scalable.""The solution is open source.""The initial setup is very easy."

More CentOS Pros →

"The product is easy to use and adapt. It is known for GUI.""The installation is not difficult. I found it to be very straightforward.""Since Windows Server has a graphical user interface (GUI), it is easy to use and implement the services that we are using.""From the very beginning, I have been using a Windows-based OS so for me, it's very easy because it's GUI compared to command line or something Linux-based.""I like its simplicity.""The stability and performance are great.""Windows server is stable, having improved on previous versions.""Windows Server is easy to use."

More Windows Server Pros →

Cons
"It would be ideal if Red Hat would continue the CentOS versions in an open-source format. They seem to be moving away from that. Now only paid versions are available.""As an open-source solution, there isn't much technical support.""CentOS NetworkManager is an area of concern in the solution that needs improvement, and it is the same with other products from Red Hat.""Continuous deployment is the only thing that can be improved.""If CentOS could add Office features then that would be beneficial. Additionally, the UI could improve.""We would like Red Hat to keep supporting the solution but they have decided to get rid of it and there isn't much we can do about it.""The tool has no official support.""This solution is no longer supported and will not receive any updates going forward."

More CentOS Cons →

"It would help if there was a possibility to postpone some updates. If some are not required, it could speed up the process of starting up the operating system. Sometimes big workloads related to services are running directly on the system itself and not the application. This is what I have noticed""It is not easy to use. It can be more user-friendly to make our routine work a bit easy. It could also be cheaper.""When it comes to the performance of this solution others are slightly better such as Linux.""The initial setup is simple for some but difficult for others.""When it comes to virtualization, VMware is a bit more advanced in terms of security. Hyper-V does provide facilities, but it probably has to do a bit more work in terms of encryption. People will normally go for VMware because of the features that it has as a server, particularly the virtualization feature.""There should be the ability to add other databases to be installed and configured instead of going to other virtual machines. They should be better integrated so they are all in one place.""In the next release, I would like to see better pricing.""It should have more stability and fewer automatic updates. A CLI approach, similar to Linux, is missing right now."

More Windows Server Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "There are no licensing costs for CentOS."
  • "It is open-source, which means it is a free product. It has a one-time deployment cost."
  • "There is no license required for this solution."
  • "There is no price or licensing required — it's open-source."
  • "There are no licensing fees. CentOS is a free solution."
  • "There are no licensing fees for CentOS."
  • "We are using a subscription-based license option for CentOS."
  • "CentOS is a free solution."
  • More CentOS Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Microsoft is relatively inexpensive compared to other database platforms."
  • "This is not an expensive product."
  • "It is an expensive product."
  • "In our case, we primarily use Microsoft, so the cost is a lot less. But some of our customers have spent approximately $12,000 a year on the operating system license."
  • "The license model needs improvement."
  • "Our current license is an enterprise license agreement which gives you a whole lot of possibility, especially when you go through an R&D process. For example, you can provision everything, spread the service use over six months, and then wrap it up. It gives you a lot of flexibility."
  • "The Windows Server standard edition is affordable."
  • "We pay yearly for a license. If you ask any vendor they will tell you that it could be cheaper."
  • More Windows Server Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Operating Systems (OS) for Business solutions are best for your needs.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparison Review
    Anonymous User
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Red Hat Enterprise Linux is fantastic. It is an inexpensive solution that has excellent security, performance, and stability, and also lots of features. I specifically like that the solution has… more »
    Top Answer:CentOS is very easy to use, and all the commands are user-friendly.
    Top Answer:The tool supports many applications.
    Top Answer:The administration interface should be more user-friendly. Some parts of the administration interface have been upgraded, while others are old-fashioned. The vendor must update everything with the… more »
    Top Answer:I used the solution for my file server, music server, and document management system.
    Ranking
    Views
    13,383
    Comparisons
    13,273
    Reviews
    31
    Average Words per Review
    362
    Rating
    8.5
    Views
    18,920
    Comparisons
    14,310
    Reviews
    27
    Average Words per Review
    344
    Rating
    8.1
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    CentOS is a versatile operating system with many use cases, including virtual spaces, scientific computing, data center servers, web-based applications, and more. Its valuable features include customization options, low memory consumption, performance, scalability, open-source nature, cost-saving, and compatibility with Red Hat packages. 

    The solution has helped organizations save money on licensing and improve testing capabilities for new implementations without spending additional resources. CentOS is a stable, reliable, and efficient operating system that is easy to use and integrate with other applications and services.

    Windows Server is a versatile solution for various tasks, including domain control, virtualization, hosting applications, databases, managing user accounts in Active Directory, file sharing, and remote server access. It is also used for endpoint security, running ERP systems, and supporting business applications such as SAP and Microsoft Dynamics. 

    The solution is user-friendly and easy to configure and install, with technical support available. Windows Server is widely used and trusted. It has helped organizations by offering a domain controller and domain service, allowing them to sell products with Microsoft and keep processes running 24/7 without downtime.

    Reviews from Real Users

    There are a number of characteristics that make Windows Server an extremely effective solution. Two major ones are its inherent flexibility and its user-friendly nature.

    PeerSpot user Antonio D., a sales manager at INFOSEC, takes note of Windows Server 2016’s flexibility when he writes, “The product is a good operating system. The features fit our needs very well. For example, with Windows Server, you can use a machine for printing, accessing the internet, or using some applications. You can do it all with one server. You don't need several servers. One is enough.”

    Himanshu T., a system administrator and DevOps engineer at a tech-services company, takes note of the various way in which Windows Server 2016 is easy to use when he writes, “This solution is very user friendly, easy to use for any system administrator, simple to deploy applications, has a wide range of applications available, great UI, and takes less technical skills to operate than some other competitors. Additionally, the active directory has great functionality; if we want to integrate any assets, then we can easily do it.”

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Rakuten, Rackspace, Tyco
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company21%
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Government12%
    Comms Service Provider12%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Government9%
    University7%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Comms Service Provider12%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company12%
    Government11%
    Educational Organization10%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business39%
    Midsize Enterprise28%
    Large Enterprise33%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise61%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business39%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise42%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise56%
    Buyer's Guide
    CentOS vs. Windows Server
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about CentOS vs. Windows Server and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    CentOS is ranked 5th in Operating Systems (OS) for Business with 63 reviews while Windows Server is ranked 4th in Operating Systems (OS) for Business with 180 reviews. CentOS is rated 8.2, while Windows Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CentOS writes "Allows you to securely store data, and command prompts make it simple to use". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Windows Server writes "Easy to setup, stable and caters to my wide range of use cases but lacks user-friendly interface". CentOS is most compared with Oracle Linux, Ubuntu Linux, Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL), SUSE Linux Enterprise and openSUSE Leap, whereas Windows Server is most compared with Ubuntu Linux, Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL), Windows 10, Oracle Linux and Oracle Solaris. See our CentOS vs. Windows Server report.

    See our list of best Operating Systems (OS) for Business vendors.

    We monitor all Operating Systems (OS) for Business reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.