We performed a comparison between Check Point CloudGuard WAF and SonarQube based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Security Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It provides advanced analytics that gives each team time to prepare for any threat that might occur in the future."
"User attitude reviews help us keep all online users compliant with company regulations and policies."
"The most effective CloudGuard feature for threat prevention is its web app protection."
"I find the configuration and real-time monitoring features valuable."
"Its ability to adapt to our applications and ensure our security policies are followed is a big plus."
"It is a highly scalable solution with a quick turnaround time for deployment and running of the software across any IT system."
"By using a cloud application security solution, our company can save costs by reducing the need for additional security hardware and software and improving operational efficiency."
"Whenever there was a new CVE, Check Point CloudGuard WAF used to block them."
"SonarQube has a lot of value, it reviews the basic coding standards and security vulnerabilities of code that help to reduce issues."
"It has very good scalability and stability."
"It is a very good tool for analysis and security vulnerability checking."
"The most valuable features are the dashboard, the ability to drill down to the code, user-friendly, and the technical debt estimation."
"The overall quality of the indicator is good."
"The reporting and the results are quick. It gets integrated within the pipeline well."
"Can tweak rules and feed them into our build pipelines."
"The most valuable features are the wide array of languages, multiple languages per project, the breakdown of bugs, and the description of vulnerabilities and code smells (best practices)."
"I advise proactive threat detection intelligence offline, which can also help monitor and ensure system checks and compliances are in place."
"There are occasions when it interfaces with other systems, leading to a loss of visibility."
"We would like the solution to be more economical since it is not accessible to all clients."
"The creation of security profiles for each application takes a lot of time."
"It was costlier than other solutions."
"CloudGuard for Application Security, like the other Check Point applications, has been presenting major latency problems when entering their administrative portal."
"I do not know if it is already there, but I would like to have complete visibility between the posture management and firewall as a service."
"The trial version should be extended further so that QA test engineers can actually test the utilities in a real sense and can provide the maximum amount of feedback for enhancements."
"There are sometimes security breaches in our code, which aren't be caught by SonarQube. In the security area, SonarCube has to improve. It needs to better compete with other products."
"Our developers have complained about the Quality Gates and the number of false positives that this product reports."
"It requires advanced heuristics to recognize more complex constructs that could be disregarded as issues."
"The solution could improve by providing more advanced technologies."
"If you don't have any experience with the configuration or how to configure the files, it can be complicated."
"SonarQube can improve by scanning the internal library which currently it does not do. We are looking for a solution for this."
"Having performance regression would be a helpful add on or ability to be able to do during the scan."
"Monitoring is a feature that can be improved in the next version."
Check Point CloudGuard WAF is ranked 11th in Application Security Tools with 30 reviews while SonarQube is ranked 1st in Application Security Tools with 110 reviews. Check Point CloudGuard WAF is rated 9.0, while SonarQube is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Check Point CloudGuard WAF writes "Automation capabilities also help streamline security processes and smooths down API integration processes and detects API availability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SonarQube writes "Easy to integrate and has a plug-in that supports both C and C++ languages". Check Point CloudGuard WAF is most compared with Checkmarx One, whereas SonarQube is most compared with Checkmarx One, SonarCloud, Coverity, Veracode and Snyk. See our Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. SonarQube report.
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
