We performed a comparison between Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade and Cisco Secure Endpoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Sophos, McAfee and others in Endpoint Encryption."Encryption prevents data loss which can cost the organization a lot of resources."
"It's easily scalable and adaptable to the needs of the business."
"It helps us maximize the operational efficiency and performance of our activities."
"This software has helped individuals in the organization avoid data loss."
"The solution provides complete security for one's workstation."
"They have Disc Encryption, Anti-Malware, and a VPN Blade which is beneficial for us."
"It keeps the devices well monitored."
"It is a cross-platform tool."
"The most valuable feature is signature-based malware detection."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its technical support."
"I am really satisfied with the technical support."
"The VPN is most valuable. It's the best thing in the market today. We can use two-factor authentication with another platform, and we can authenticate with two-factor."
"It used to take us a month to find out that something is infected, we now know that same day, as soon it is infected."
"The most valuable feature at this moment is that Cisco AMP or Cisco Secure Endpoint solution is delivering a lot of things, and I always say to a lot of customers that if we didn't have Cisco AMP, we probably would have had ransomware somewhere. So, it's protecting us very well from a lot of hackers, malware, and especially ransomware."
"The solution is easy to deploy and applies multi-factor authentication."
"The product itself is pretty reliable. The security features that it has make it reliable."
"The tool should be able to recover data from a stolen device."
"Sometimes the performance rates are not consistent."
"The response time for technical support could be faster."
"The encryption is fast; however, when it comes to generating decryption of the OS disks, it is sometimes very slow, generating a loss of time."
"Regarding the general topic of support, many have annoyances with it."
"While the solution works as it should, it is overly expensive."
"The cost of maintaining the system is high for personal use."
"They should improve the interface and make it a little more user-friendly."
"The initial setup is a bit complex because you need to execute existing antiviruses or security software that you have on your device."
"The thing I hate the most, which they have not fixed, is when it creates duplicate entries within a console. If you have a computer and you upgrade from Windows 7 to Windows 10, or you upgrade your agent from version 6 to 7, it creates a new instance in there instead of updating the information. Instead of paying a license for one computer, I have to license two computers until I manually go in, search for all the duplicate entries, and clean them out myself."
"The integration of the Cisco products for security could be better in the sense that not everything is integrated, and they aren't working together. In addition, not all products are multi-tenant, so you can't separate different customer environments from each other, which makes it a little bit hard for a managed service provider to deliver services to the customers."
"We would like to have an API integration with a SIEM solution, because as far as I know, it currently hasn't yet been released."
"The technical support is very slow."
"In Orbital, there are tons of prebuilt queries, but there is not a lot of information in lay terms. There isn't enough information to help us with what we're looking for and why we are looking for it with this query. There are probably a dozen queries in there that really focus on what I need to focus on, but they are not always easy to find the first time through."
"The initial setup of Cisco Secure Endpoint is complex."
"It's pretty good as it is, but its cost could be improved."
More Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade is ranked 4th in Endpoint Encryption with 16 reviews while Cisco Secure Endpoint is ranked 10th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 45 reviews. Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade is rated 8.6, while Cisco Secure Endpoint is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade writes "Centralized management with full disk encryption and helpful authentification capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cisco Secure Endpoint writes "Makes it possible to see a threat once and block it across all endpoints and your entire security platform". Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade is most compared with Microsoft BitLocker, whereas Cisco Secure Endpoint is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, CrowdStrike Falcon, Check Point Harmony Endpoint and VMware Carbon Black Endpoint.
We monitor all Endpoint Encryption reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
