Check Point IPS vs Cisco Sourcefire SNORT comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Check Point Software Technologies Logo
5,638 views|3,950 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Cisco Logo
2,043 views|1,518 comparisons
94% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Check Point IPS and Cisco Sourcefire SNORT based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Check Point IPS vs. Cisco Sourcefire SNORT Report (Updated: May 2024).
771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The notifications are the most valuable feature of the solution.""IPS easily allows follow-up flags on recently updated patterns. If, in rare cases, a false positive does occur, it is quickly detected and an exception can be easily created.""Check Point is one of the best security brands worldwide.""The most valuable feature of Check Point IPS is the management of devices and policies.""Check Point IPS manages risk categories very well and accordingly helps us protect each of our devices in real-time.""Its event analysis and centralization features are very important for any organization.""The Check Point IPS module allows me granularity in creating rules.""User-friendly and easy to implement."

More Check Point IPS Pros →

"The URL filtering is very good and you can create a group for customized URLs.""Cisco Sourcefire SNORT is easy to configure and the reporting is great. It's also very user-friendly.""Solid intrusion detection and prevention that scales easily in very large environments.""It has a huge rate of protection. It's has a low level of positives and a huge rate of threat protection. It's easy to deploy and easy to implement. It has an incredible price rate compared to similar solutions.""I like most of Cisco's features, like malware detection and URL filtering.""The most valuable feature of this solution is the filtering.""The most valuable feature is the ability to automatically learn the traffic in our environment, and change the merit recommendations based on that.""The most valuable feature is the visibility that we have across the virtual environment."

More Cisco Sourcefire SNORT Pros →

Cons
"Having additional reports available would be helpful.""There is no standalone IPS appliance available.""I hear from my admin that the firmware upgrade process is quite cumbersome.""The pain point that I have with this solution is contacting technical support.""It requires a lot of people to maintain the solution.""The tool's pricing could be better.""The installation documentation has room for improvement.""The hardware-based version of Check Point IPS could be more scalable. Right now, it's not scalable."

More Check Point IPS Cons →

"The solution's approach to managing traffic blocking is confusing and impractical.""Performance needs improvement.""I did not experience any pain points that required improvement. Maybe a couple of false-positives, but that's about it.""The initial setup is a little difficult compared to other products in the market. It depends on the environment. If we are doing any migration, it might take months in a brown-field environment.""If the price is brought down then everybody will be happy.""To be frank, the product is not really stable, although they're working on that. Whenever I go to the technical community with an issue, they will usually say that it is not there yet, but the technical team are working on it. The issues are not insolvable. I think they should just keep working on the product to make sure that the product can become very stable. The technical support is great. I appreciate that. We have a lot of communities supporting Firepower now, so you can find help for whatever issue you have.""I would like to have analytics included in the suite.""With the next release, I would like to see some PBR, so that you can do the configuration with the features."

More Cisco Sourcefire SNORT Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I think that the price of support is around $40,000 USD or $50,000 USD per year."
  • "The price of this product should be reduced."
  • "Enabling IPS does not require any additional license purchase from OEM, as it comes by default with the NGFW bundle."
  • "The pricing for Check Point IPS is competitive and brings good value for the money."
  • "The module has a considerable cost but you can save by purchasing a package with several modules instead of making a single purchase."
  • "Pricing for this solution is negotiable and I'm happy with our pricing."
  • "There is a license needed to use the Check Point IPS which is not expensive. However, the Check Point IPS device is expensive."
  • "You can pay for Check Point IPS yearly, or you can go with a three-year license. There's no extra cost apart from the standard licensing fee."
  • More Check Point IPS Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "We have a three-year license for this solution."
  • "Licensing for this solution is paid on a yearly basis."
  • "I don't know the exact amount, but most of the time when I go to a company with a proposition, they will say, "This thing that you are selling is good, but it's expensive. Why don't you propose something like FortiGate, Check Point, or Palo Alto?" Cisco device are expensive compared to other devices."
  • "The cost is per port and can be expensive but it does include training and support for three years."
  • More Cisco Sourcefire SNORT Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions are best for your needs.
    771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The tool's most valuable feature is its detection panel. Managing and updating policies within Check Point IPS is easy and without issues. It provides a secure network.
    Top Answer:The tool's licensing model is good. The licensing costs are yearly. I rate it an eight out of ten.
    Top Answer:The product is inexpensive compared to leading brands such as Palo Alto or Fortinet.
    Top Answer:The product is inexpensive compared to leading brands such as Palo Alto or Fortinet. It is cheaper than Palo Alto and comparable to Fortinet. It also depends on Cisco’s discount. Sometimes it's… more »
    Top Answer:The solution has some stability issues. Also, it's complicated compared to other products like FortiGate.
    Ranking
    Views
    5,638
    Comparisons
    3,950
    Reviews
    28
    Average Words per Review
    426
    Rating
    8.5
    Views
    2,043
    Comparisons
    1,518
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    472
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Check Point Intrusion Prevention System
    Sourcefire SNORT
    Learn More
    Overview

    Check Point IPS is an intrusion prevention system that aims to detect and prevent attempts to exploit weaknesses in vulnerable systems or applications. The solution provides complete, integrated, next-generation firewall intrusion prevention capabilities at multi-gigabit speeds with a low false positive rate and high security. It helps organizations secure their enterprise network, and protect servers and critical data against known and unknown automated malware, blended threats, and other threats.

    Check Point IPS Features

    Check Point IPS has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

    • Real-time protections: IPS is constantly updated with new defenses against emerging threats. Because the solution’s IPS protections are pre-emptive, it provides organizations with defenses before exploits are created or vulnerabilities are even discovered.
    • Virtual patching: The solution combines robust IPS functionality with a concerted patching strategy, allowing network administrators to secure networks between upgrades and patches.
    • Flexible deployment: Check Point IPS was designed to be deployed easily and efficiently.
    • 360 visibility and reporting: To help users achieve an unmatched level of visibility that detects and prevents threats, Check Point IPS integrates with SmartEvent, enabling security operations center (SOC) staff to respond to high-priority events first.

    Check Point IPS Benefits

    There are many benefits to implementing Check Point IPS. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

    • Efficient: Check Point IPS includes acceleration technologies that let you safely enable IPS. Additionally, its low false positive rate can save a lot of time.
    • Secure: The solution delivers thousands of signature and behavioral preemptive protections, making it a very secure tool.
    • Unified: With Check Point IPS, users can Enable IPS on any Check Point security gateway, thereby reducing Total Cost of Ownership (TCO).

    Reviews from Real Users

    Check Point IPS is a solution that stands out when compared to many of its competitors. Some of its major advantages are that it has granularity capabilities for rule creation, quick updates of signatures, and a helpful mechanism that allows users to turn IPS signatures to a different mode automatically.

    A System and Network Administrator at Auriga mentions, “The Check Point IPS module allows me granularity in creating rules. I can specify which definition to apply and to which scope or network.” The reviewer also adds, “I can create multiple profiles, which is helpful.”

    “The quick updates of the signatures when a new threat is identified are great. For instance, when Microsoft releases patches, we usually see new signatures for those issues that have to be patched in a day. This gives us time to test/deploy the patches while already being protected from the threats. Also, it's very good with reporting. I can generate reports for management automatically based on the threats of the last day/week/whatever is needed,” says a Systems en networks engineer at CB.

    Another PeerSpot user, a Network Engineer at VSP Vision Care, writes, “The mechanism where you can let the system automatically turn the IPS signature to a different mode (prevent / monitor / inactive) is a nice feature that allows us to easily adjust the balance between security protection and the risk of business impact.”

    Snort is an open-source, rule-based, intrusion detection and prevention system. It combines the benefits of signature-, protocol-, and anomaly-based inspection methods to deliver flexible protection from malware attacks. Snort gained notoriety for being able to accurately detect threats at high speeds.

    Sample Customers
    Morton Salt, Medical Advocacy and Outreach, BH Telecom, Lightbeam Health Solutions, X by Orange, Cadence, Nihondentsu, Datastream Connexion, Good Sam, Omnyway, FIASA, Pacific Life, Banco del Pacifico, Control Southern, Xero, Centrify
    CareCore, City of Biel, Dimension Data, LightEdge, Lone Star College System, National Rugby League, Port Aventura, Smart City Networks, Telecom Italia, The Department of Education in Western Australia
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Security Firm21%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Government10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Government7%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company27%
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Comms Service Provider18%
    Government9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Government9%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business43%
    Midsize Enterprise25%
    Large Enterprise32%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise54%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise39%
    Large Enterprise39%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise62%
    Buyer's Guide
    Check Point IPS vs. Cisco Sourcefire SNORT
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point IPS vs. Cisco Sourcefire SNORT and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Check Point IPS is ranked 3rd in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) with 46 reviews while Cisco Sourcefire SNORT is ranked 12th in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) with 18 reviews. Check Point IPS is rated 8.6, while Cisco Sourcefire SNORT is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Check Point IPS writes "Great for detection and access with the capabilities of defining specific rules". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cisco Sourcefire SNORT writes "An IPS solution for security and protection but lacks stability". Check Point IPS is most compared with Darktrace, Palo Alto Networks URL Filtering with PAN-DB, Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention, Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System and Vectra AI, whereas Cisco Sourcefire SNORT is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate IPS, Cisco NGIPS, Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention, Darktrace and Vectra AI. See our Check Point IPS vs. Cisco Sourcefire SNORT report.

    See our list of best Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) vendors.

    We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.