We performed a comparison between Cisco Catalyst Switches and Enterasys Campus LAN Switches based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two LAN Switching solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The pricing is quite good."
"Technical support is very helpful, even during implementation."
"I've had no problems with the stability of this solution."
"The product’s scalability and performance are valuable."
"The product is reliable."
"The product is very robust."
"The most important features are that Cisco is one of the most robust switches, it is easy to configure, and the documentation is pretty good."
"Catalyst switches are our dedicated solution for connecting everything into one big domain."
"Extreme Networks is the only one that has this kind of universal switch. It simplifies things greatly. Customers no longer have to worry about the price differences between traditional and fabric technology switches, which used to have their own pricing. This has made it easier for us as solution providers to tailor options for our customers with fewer but more suitable choices."
"The performance is good."
"Enterasys Campus LAN Switches is a trustable and powerful solution. The solution has good web management features. You can do whatever you want, like a CLI. The solution is easy to diagnose and manage. I like the Linux-based operating system. If any service crashes, you need to restart the system."
"The solution was stable 10 years ago, there is room for improvement in this area."
"Cisco Catalyst Switches should have better performance and be easier to use. Additionally, they should add artificial intelligence features."
"The price could be improved."
"The solution could improve by allowing administrators to create scripts to help automate processes to make tasks easier."
"Cisco is weird about their pricing models, so that's one problem. Their operating system is also a little outdated."
"The current catalyst is probably outdated so we will most likely move to the newer version of the solution soon."
"The solution offers a bit of complexity and you need a specialized workforce."
"Any improvements that they make should be in the wireless area of the product."
"While the support is good, it could be better, and the price could be reduced."
"The tool's price is high. We need a cost-effective service. It also needs to add wireless controller features like Huawei."
"Security features do exist, and they're mostly common with other switches. What makes these switches unique is the ability to see application layers on the switch, but not directly through the switch. There are tools from Extreme Networks that allow visibility of such traffic, which other switches lack. Extreme CloudIQ analytics can analyze all the traffic on Extreme Switches up to layer seven, offering full visibility. However, this tool is necessary for such detailed analytics and might not be compatible with some third-party products."
More Enterasys Campus LAN Switches Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cisco Catalyst Switches is ranked 1st in LAN Switching with 171 reviews while Enterasys Campus LAN Switches is ranked 11th in LAN Switching with 3 reviews. Cisco Catalyst Switches is rated 8.6, while Enterasys Campus LAN Switches is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Cisco Catalyst Switches writes "Reliable and stable catalyst switch; can be easily installed". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Enterasys Campus LAN Switches writes "A powerful solution with good web management features ". Cisco Catalyst Switches is most compared with Arista Networks Platform, Dell PowerConnect Switches, Cisco Nexus, HPE ProCurve and ExtremeSwitching, whereas Enterasys Campus LAN Switches is most compared with . See our Cisco Catalyst Switches vs. Enterasys Campus LAN Switches report.
See our list of best LAN Switching vendors.
We monitor all LAN Switching reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.