We performed a comparison between Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) and Keeper based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, HPE Aruba Networking, Fortinet and others in Network Access Control (NAC)."The best features are the scalability and the license structure."
"There is good integration with third-party systems like antivirus patch management, MDM."
"ISE's most valuable feature is integration between IT and OTs."
"I love the policy sets, they are really nice and dynamic."
"A lot of customers use a third party to manage their guest Wi-Fi. Cisco ISE presents the ability to bring that in-house so that customers can have full control over it, change the branding, and get extra telemetry from it and the user data. It works really well for our customers."
"The TACACS and RADIUS have been the most valuable features so far."
"TACACS and .1X security are the most valuable features. TACACS acts for user control, so no one can authenticate to our network devices, and .1X is to validate that unauthorized devices are plugged into our network."
"The biggest value of ISE is that it can get so granular with gaming systems, versus IoT and BYOD."
"i have only one password to remember, which is the one to get me into Keeper."
"It saves us from duplicating passwords for different accounts."
"I like the tool's keyword editor and SSO."
"Stronger passwords are being used across the board in our organization."
"It syncs with all devices and supports all platforms."
"Keeper was user-friendly."
"It is very easy to use, intuitive, and cost effective."
"A useful solution for storing encryption keys, programming and developing a SaaS platform."
"Cisco ISE does not recognize devices and that is an issue we faced during its integration with our existing devices."
"The interface is a little bit complex."
"The Guest Network verification needs to add a QR code option."
"I'd like to see the logging be a bit more robust in terms of what it has baked in. If I want to do any in-depth searching, I have to export all the logs to an external platform like Elastic or LogRhythm and then parse through them myself. It would be nice if I could find what I want, when I want it, on the platform itself."
"I would like to see the product simplified more, especially with the configuration."
"The intuitiveness of the user interface could be improved."
"The interface is not very user-friendly and it is not simple to use."
"I would rate this solution a 7.5 out of ten. To make it a ten they should have more people on tech support. They need to invest more in the product. It's a good product. They should just work on tech support. More support for the customer. It's not that easy to get somebody to understand this product. I have had some issues with tech before for the solution. One of them brought the solution down due to some of his activity. They need to hugely invest in their tech support."
"Keeper does not provide password management for mobile apps."
"The stability of the solution can be improved."
"The technical support for this solution could be faster support and improved if they had a better understanding of my questions."
"I would love it if you didn't have to re-authenticate when you start up a new browser."
"The organization of items needs improvement. For example, when I log onto the cloud version as well, everything is shown on my folder. It is hard to differentiate between files and documents in my list of items I have stored inside."
"The technical support has no experience."
"Search functions are sometimes weird."
"Needs to improve KeeperFill on iOS."
More Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) is ranked 1st in Network Access Control (NAC) with 138 reviews while Keeper is ranked 11th in Enterprise Password Managers with 32 reviews. Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) is rated 8.2, while Keeper is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) writes "Gives us that extra ability to assist the end user and make sure that we are making them happy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Keeper writes "It's an inexpensive, scalable solution that has improved our security". Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) is most compared with Aruba ClearPass, Fortinet FortiNAC, Forescout Platform, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, whereas Keeper is most compared with HashiCorp Vault, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Azure Key Vault and LastPass.
We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.