We performed a comparison between Cisco Prime and Juniper Mist Wired Assurance based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Management Applications solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of Cisco Prime is the heat map."
"Cisco Prime is a good tool for inventory monitoring and wireless management."
"We use this solution to troubleshoot our wireless systems, specifically regarding signal strength."
"The most valuable feature of Cisco Prime is its excellent audio and video conferencing with clear quality and no interruptions."
"The endpoint information Cisco Prime generates helps us troubleshoot, and it's also useful for compliance reporting and endpoint identification."
"The technical support team is very good."
"The most valuable is the assistance for network support."
"The product's most valuable features are monitoring and configuration."
"The product greatly improved our organization in terms of making configuration, deployment, and firmware upgrades easy for multiple automated devices."
"The most valuable feature of Juniper Mist Wired Assurance is zero-touch provisioning for query edge switches. You can connect the switch directly to your edge locations and then directly onboard, similar to the Cisco Meraki solutions."
"The solution has issues with real time monitoring of devices and NetFlow such as inadequate visualization for reports, sources, and destinations."
"I rate Cisco Prime seven out of 10 for affordability. All Cisco solutions are expensive."
"The reporting feature of Cisco Prime should be improved."
"The user interface of Cisco Prime could be more user-friendly and increase its performance."
"The reporting could be simplified and the information made clearer to the user."
"They could consider offering more flexible pricing options for their customers."
"If you look at some of the wireless site-survey tools that are available in the commercial space, Cisco should include similar solutions, which would help our on-plant engineers when they're doing a site survey."
"Cisco Prime's initial setup is complex."
"The configuration aspect of the solutions is relatively new, but I have had positive experiences. However, for more advanced tasks, such as VXLANs on the EX platform, Juniper Mist Wired Assurance may not be the best option due to certain limitations. Nonetheless, it does have a CLI override feature for specialized configurations that cannot be done through the GUI."
"The platform’s monitoring tool is not up to the mark. It is not proactive enough and lacks some capabilities. Additionally, they should work on providing integration with other vendors."
Cisco Prime is ranked 2nd in Network Management Applications with 35 reviews while Juniper Mist Wired Assurance is ranked 13th in Network Management Applications with 2 reviews. Cisco Prime is rated 7.8, while Juniper Mist Wired Assurance is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cisco Prime writes "Robust, cost-effective, and provides good visibility, but the scalability could improve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Juniper Mist Wired Assurance writes "Simple installation, helpful zero-touch provisioning , and quick support". Cisco Prime is most compared with Cisco DNA Center, SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager, Aruba Airwave, Huawei eSight and DX Spectrum, whereas Juniper Mist Wired Assurance is most compared with Cisco DNA Center, Junos Space Network Director, ExtremeCloud IQ, HPE Intelligent Management Center and Aruba Airwave. See our Cisco Prime vs. Juniper Mist Wired Assurance report.
See our list of best Network Management Applications vendors.
We monitor all Network Management Applications reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
