We performed a comparison between Cisco Threat Grid and Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Threat Intelligence Platforms solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is easy to implement and is very scalable. It also comes with very good documentation. Cisco provides good technical support as well."
"The simplicity of implementation is valuable."
"The most valuable feature is the integration with firewalls. It's integrated with AMP so the ecosystem with equal solutions from Threat Grid is good with CISCO products."
"The product's anti-spam and malware-scanning features are useful. We scan email attachments, documents, and malicious codes."
"I value how Threat Intelligence integrates with the different platforms in Microsoft."
"You can use it to monitor third parties and ensure they are not under threat attacks. It is beneficial in the GRC model."
"They have a very transparent roadmap for the product."
"The global review and remediation of malicious code is probably the most valuable feature."
"The tool can proactively detect potential incidents."
"Microsoft's integration into the security stack works quite well."
"I rate the tool's stability a ten out of ten."
"They come in and have multiple management solutions but it doesn't scan or doesn't have the ability to look at every file extension."
"I was told that the user interface could be more user friendly and easy in comparison to that of competitors. I remember that there is a competitor who has a much easier interface for many users to interact with."
"Support must be improved."
"The product's dashboard and incident reports functionality needs enhancement."
"Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence is evolving and needs to fix and enhance numerous issues like stability and licensing. The continuous rebranding and licensing changes are confusing."
"I would like to see more integration with other solutions. For example, integration well with Microsoft but not with other solutions."
"It takes time for the support team to understand the issue, and they then respond with a delay at times, which causes a lot of trouble."
"We encounter problems connecting the product deployed on the user endpoints with the servers."
"It would be beneficial to enhance the pricing structure and make it more affordable."
"The stability of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"One area that can be improved is reducing false positives."
More Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cisco Threat Grid is ranked 21st in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 3 reviews while Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence is ranked 3rd in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 27 reviews. Cisco Threat Grid is rated 7.6, while Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Cisco Threat Grid writes "Has good integration with firewalls but has limited file extensions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence writes "A tool that offers endpoint protection with low maintenance costs". Cisco Threat Grid is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon and Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus, whereas Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence is most compared with Microsoft Sentinel, STAXX, VirusTotal, ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) and Splunk Mission Control. See our Cisco Threat Grid vs. Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence report.
See our list of best Threat Intelligence Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
