We performed a comparison between Citrix Analytics for Security and IBM Security QRadar based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's user-friendly when compared to other products."
"It is very stable. We have not faced interruptions in the past four and a half years."
"I think it's a very stable product that provides much more visibility than the other product."
"It is a very good SIEM."
"What we like about QRadar and the models that IBM has, is it can go from a small-to-medium enterprise to a larger organization, and it gives you the same value."
"What I like about IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics is that it uses machine learning algorithms to generate risk scoring for the user activity. I also like that it syncs with our Active Directory users, so it really has full coverage for all users in our environment."
"Most of our clients are interested in automation. The automation part is good because they are able to detect threats and vulnerabilities in real time. It's very fast."
"Customer service is very good and very helpful."
"Lacks recording features."
"The remote access features need improvement."
"I would like the rule creation interface to be much more user-friendly in the next release."
"The technical support is poor. Mostly because when I open a PMR for IBM, I am stuck with Level 1 staff. As an engineer, nothing that I am bringing them does not require Level 2 or Level 3 support."
"The user interface is a bit difficult to get used to."
"They have to build more quantitative monitoring, profiling, and make it more predictive."
"Technical support is good, but not great."
"IBM is going through some problems with its resources currently making its support response time slow."
"QVM is another instance where they need to revise the vulnerability scoring and the proper remediation details."
"I would suggest QRadar release any documentation or give an online demo, like videos on YouTube. It would increase publicity and public appeal."
More Citrix Analytics for Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Citrix Analytics for Security is ranked 18th in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) with 2 reviews while IBM Security QRadar is ranked 1st in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) with 198 reviews. Citrix Analytics for Security is rated 8.0, while IBM Security QRadar is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Citrix Analytics for Security writes "Helped the organization to provide high-security access to applications and performs well". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Security QRadar writes "A highly stable and scalable solution that provides good technical support". Citrix Analytics for Security is most compared with , whereas IBM Security QRadar is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security, Microsoft Sentinel, Wazuh, LogRhythm SIEM and Elastic Security. See our Citrix Analytics for Security vs. IBM Security QRadar report.
See our list of best User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) vendors.
We monitor all User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.