Claroty Platform vs Statseeker comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Claroty Logo
185 views|161 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Statseeker Logo
467 views|319 comparisons
93% willing to recommend
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The product helps mitigate potential threats, especially if its users have signature rules. The product also provides alerts."

More Claroty Platform Pros →

"Being able to look back historically at the uptime and downtime is invaluable.""We are a smaller enterprise, but we're watching approximately fifteen-thousand switchboards with no problem at all.""Statseeker helps to quickly see if you have a spike or something going on. In the future, we need to get NetFlow in the tool so we can see what the IP is.""This solution helps in terms of troubleshooting, and you can do capacity planning with it.""It also allows us to predict the capacity on WAN circuits, as well as other circuits, to help us plan for upgrading.""It is fairly simple and easy to use as an all-purpose network monitor.""The graphics and trends are the most valuable for us.""The most important feature is just the fact that it doesn't aggregate the information up, and I can look at detailed information going back quite a long time."

More Statseeker Pros →

Cons
"The product's integration capabilities are an area of concern where improvements are required."

More Claroty Platform Cons →

"I would like to have soft alarming. If an inner-base all of a sudden triggers a threshold, we have to rely on a lot of other tools and then we go into Statseeker to verify it. If Statseeker would confirm it preemptively and trigger it into our network panel, that would be nice.""The main issue I've seen, in the last six months to a year, is when I upgrade I seem to be hitting bugs. The upgrade won't go smoothly and I have to engage support. These things happen when you upgrade, it's not the end of the world, but from a stability point of view, the only time I've so far, is during upgrades.""I would like to see some layer two and layer three topology mappings, similar to what NNMi and SolarWinds presents.""The user interface needs to be made more intuitive.""It would be nice if I could easily select individual interfaces.""The inclusion of configuration management features and SIP links would improve this solution.""With Statseeker I'd like to see some flow, i.e. what's tuning-up the network. The trend I like is managing the traffic load by going to the cloud.""I would like to see a friendlier user interface in the administration tool."

More Statseeker Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "Pricing is reasonable but licensing should unlimited."
  • "One thing that needs improvement is how it's licensed. I understand historically the company licensed it off a same charge for everyone. I understand the company needs to make money, but how they introduced the tiered licensing model, and then multiple layers of licensing was a bit of an issue. So, on the whole, coming up with a licensing model that isn't confusing and complicated and is easy to understand would be one way to improve the product. They have told me lately that they're changing how they license stuff, but they haven't made that - as I understand it - in their marketing material public knowledge as of yet. I would say that at the moment it's a bit convoluted. It's confusing. Some of their basic licensing model is a bit of a ripoff. If you go over five or ten support calls in the basic licensing model they start charging you for support calls. I think that's a bit rich."
  • "Up until we actually talked to Statseeker, and Statseeker came and gave us an enterprise licensing model for multiple accounts, I would have said the pricing was not good value. The fact they've come to the party now and given us a very good discount, I would say it's probably about right, the pricing they're giving us now. But the retail pricing, if I went out and, as a separate company, and asked for pricing for one account, I probably would say their retail pricing is not competitive. The fact that they've given us a discount now because we have multiple servers across multiple accounts, I would say that pricing is about right, but not their retail pricing. It's too expensive."
  • "We now feel the pricing is a good value. Previously we had a just a normal license but now we've got an Enterprise license. Since the Enterprise, it's been a lot better value. We did think it was pretty expensive before, but with the Enterprise license it's almost less than half that price. If you have a number of accounts within the organization that use Statseeker, I would suggest get the Enterprise license."
  • "We paid $5,000 to $10,000 a year in maintenance."
  • "We have permanent licenses so there's really no cost, other than ongoing maintenance. When I think about it, that's running us about $20,000 a year."
  • "It would definitely be a yearly licensing cost, but I don't know what it is."
  • "It's probably $5K a year for the license."
  • More Statseeker Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cyber-Physical Systems Protection solutions are best for your needs.
    771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Nozomi Networks and Claroty Platform are both leading operational technology (OT) security solutions offering a wide range of features, including asset discovery, risk assessment, and threat… more »
    Top Answer:The product helps mitigate potential threats, especially if its users have signature rules. The product also provides alerts.
    Top Answer:The product fulfills our company's needs. Currently, Claroty Platform focuses on industrial control systems and OT. If Claroty Platform expands to the IT network side, it will benefit Claroty and… more »
    Top Answer:We are content with our current setup and its features. Additionally, we appreciate Statseeker's responsiveness to our queries and requests for improvements, particularly in monitoring. The upcoming… more »
    Top Answer:There is a need for many developments to mature Statseeker. It should provide a study use case to show how it monitors the SD-WAN service.
    Top Answer:Statseeker provides the basic monitoring status of our network elements, including latency, ping delays, and ping drops. Its strengths lie in a couple of areas. Firstly, it is not an expensive tool… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    185
    Comparisons
    161
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    816
    Rating
    8.0
    64th
    Views
    467
    Comparisons
    319
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    893
    Rating
    7.0
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    The Claroty Platform is tailored for monitoring and securing industrial control systems. It offers deep visibility into OT networks, enabling effective anomaly detection and vulnerability assessments. Its user-friendly interface and robust reporting tools facilitate easy management and compliance, enhancing organizational efficiency and cybersecurity posture in industrial environments.

    Statseeker is the only network performance monitoring technology to seamlessly and successfully combine speed + scale + value. Statseeker is a global provider delivering innovative network monitoring solutions for the IT enterprise and OT industrial market space. With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Instant visibility: Installed in minutes, polls up to 1 million ports from a single server… reduce your time to repair. Powerful monitoring: Checks every port over entire network, every 60 seconds… low network consumption bandwidth. Fast reporting: Practical real-time dashboard, reports in seconds, instant alerts… maximize your up-time. Smart data: 100% network data, original granularity, never rolled up, never averaged… tune for peak performance, control CAPEX and OPEX.
    Sample Customers
    Rockwell Automation
    With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Some example customers include: FedEx, Optus, Verizon, California State University, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Monash University, Texas A&M University.
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Energy/Utilities Company12%
    Financial Services Firm5%
    REVIEWERS
    Healthcare Company27%
    University14%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Educational Organization9%
    Computer Software Company8%
    University8%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise67%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business2%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise83%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise70%

    Claroty Platform is ranked 1st in Cyber-Physical Systems Protection with 1 review while Statseeker is ranked 64th in Network Monitoring Software with 38 reviews. Claroty Platform is rated 8.0, while Statseeker is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Claroty Platform writes "Provides good visibility of the devices in a user's environment". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Statseeker writes "Simplifies monitoring and provides real-time alerts for issues we might not immediately be aware of otherwise". Claroty Platform is most compared with Nozomi Networks, Tenable OT Security, Dragos, Darktrace and Armis, whereas Statseeker is most compared with Fortinet FortiSIEM.

    We monitor all Cyber-Physical Systems Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.