We performed a comparison between Comindware Tracker and IBM WebSphere BPMS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Process Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The clean interface, prioritization, and private task lists aren't present in other solutions."
"It was easy to set up my team with access credentials to their files."
"The most valuable feature is that any non-technical personnel can easily work on the solution, redefining processes and creating drag and drop workflows according to the department or cross-department needs."
"It successfully routes hand-offs between different teams, adds transparency to workflows, and has a set of social collaboration tools."
"This software added transparency to our workflows. It helped with increasing throughput of clients and their satisfaction."
"This software makes it so easy and enjoyable to work with the team. Any user can learn and start using the application quickly."
"It is perhaps the most user-friendly web forms automation software. At least, I did not find anything better while testing several others similar to it."
"The feature I have found most valuable is the easy synchronization with other tools."
"This product is flexible in its ability to integrate processes and it can be extended and integrated with other software."
"We like the feature in which we can trace back instances."
"The UI capabilities of the solution are great. The speed of delivery is good."
"I would like them to offer a one-time payment plan that one can choose."
"If your organization has only a few team members then this tool is not suitable."
"There are not very many report templates, and if there were more, it would really help."
"We are using the backdated version of this software. That is why we lack of some features. I hope when we update the version, then all the problems will be solved."
"This solution lacks API integration with some popular websites."
"The initial setup seemed a bit complex, and there is no great documentation."
"Figuring out how to integrate defined teams or groups into this system is difficult, and there are no contextual menus."
"The UX/UI could be reviewed and revamped to meet new the criteria of Digitalization and Innovation."
"The solution lacks acceptable stability."
"The user interface could be improved, and although integration opportunities are good, they could be improved further."
"Sometimes there are tasks that failed without any reason."
Comindware Tracker is ranked 33rd in Process Automation while IBM WebSphere BPMS is ranked 32nd in Process Automation. Comindware Tracker is rated 9.6, while IBM WebSphere BPMS is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of Comindware Tracker writes "Easy to navigate and great for keeping everybody in the loop". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM WebSphere BPMS writes "Standardizes and automates business processes for efficiency ". Comindware Tracker is most compared with , whereas IBM WebSphere BPMS is most compared with . See our Comindware Tracker vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS report.
See our list of best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
