We performed a comparison between Conformiq and OpenText ALM / Quality Center based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, IDERA, Microsoft and others in Test Management Tools."Though optimized and automated test generation is the core functionality, the product's integration with other tools sets it apart."
"The tool has the ability to integrate with various requirement management, test management, and version control tools."
"As a system administrator, HPE ALM can be flexibly configured so that it can accommodate a variety of defined project lifecycles and test methodologies."
"ALM is a well-known product and is one of the pioneers in providing test management facilities with a 360 degree view of requirements."
"What they do best is test management. That's their strong point."
"Business process management is the most valuable feature of the solution."
"The most valuable feature is the ST Add-In. It's a Microsoft add-in that makes it much easier to upload test cases into Quality Center."
"The tools could be useful if we were utilizing them more effectively"
"With test execution, you have an option to create custom fields. It is also really user-friendly. With other tools, we only have restricted fields and we cannot customize or add new columns or fields that users can make use of while testing. ALM is very flexible for creating new fields. It is easy for users to understand the application."
"The solution's support team was always there to help."
"It would be helpful to have a feature in the tool's UI to map object locators within the system."
"Even though the 4.1 version is a far-improved version from its earlier avatars, the performance of test generation is still an issue on real-time models we have."
"I would like to see the output data optionally used as input for the model, as further action in the flow."
"There are always new features and more support for new and legacy technology architectures with each release. But the bad news is a growing list of long-standing issues with the product rarely gets addressed."
"They should specify every protocol or process with labels or names."
"Lacks sufficient plug-ins."
"There is room for improvement in the scalability and stability of the solution."
"I'd like to see the concept of teams put into it."
"ALM uses a waterfall approach. We have some hybrid approaches in the company and need a more agile approach."
"We have had a poor experience with customer service and support."
"There's room for improvement on the reporting side of things and the scheduling, in general, is a bit clunky."
More OpenText ALM / Quality Center Pricing and Cost Advice →
Conformiq is ranked 20th in Test Management Tools while OpenText ALM / Quality Center is ranked 1st in Test Management Tools with 197 reviews. Conformiq is rated 8.0, while OpenText ALM / Quality Center is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Conformiq writes "Feature-rich stable tool with multiple options to control output, good integration with other tools, and knowledgeable support team". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText ALM / Quality Center writes "Offers features for higher-end traceability and integration with different tools but lacks in scalability ". Conformiq is most compared with Tricentis Tosca and SmartBear TestComplete, whereas OpenText ALM / Quality Center is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, OpenText ALM Octane, Jira, Tricentis qTest and Zephyr Enterprise.
See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.