We performed a comparison between D3 Security and Fortinet FortiSOAR based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The product can integrate with any device."
"While Microsoft Sentinel provides a log of security events, its true power lies in its integration with Microsoft Defender."
"We can use Sentinel's playbook to block threats. It covers all of the environment, giving us great visibility."
"The UI-based analytics are excellent."
"Sentinel has an intuitive, user-friendly way to visualize the data properly. It gives me a solid overview of all the logs. We get a more detailed view that I can't get from the other SIEM tools. It has some IP and URL-specific allow listing"
"The Log analytics are useful."
"The AI capability is one of the main features of the solution because I believe that in the market, there are few solutions that are providing security solutions based on AI and machine learning."
"If you know how to do KQL (kusto query language) queries, which are how you query the log data inside Sentinel, the information is pretty rich. You can get down to a good level of detail regarding event information or notifications."
"The solution's valuable feature is its GUI. It has more than 450 connectors, which are excellent for connecting devices and automating integration. The solution has all the features we need. We deployed it in our environment, and it's fully integrated. Thanks to their open APIs, the seamless integration makes everything work well together."
"It is an out-of-the-box automated integration with our 20 departments. We perform L1 LiveOps automatically through the portal."
"The most valuable feature of Fortinet FortiSOAR is the number of available connectors and the simplicity to start to automate."
"The good news is that FortiSOAR is not hard to maintain. If you prepared well and deployed strong initially, then maintenance will take half an hour every other week, not more than that. A single person can do it."
"The most valuable feature of Fortinet FortiSOAR is the playbook, which has to be defined to apply the policies."
"The reputation of the brand is very good."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"It's great that the solution is integrated with FortiAnalyzer."
"We use the product for security."
"The solution is easy to implement and includes 450 built-in connectors."
"Its documentation is not so simple. It is easy for somebody who is Microsoft certified or more closely attached to Microsoft solutions. It is not easy for those who are working on open-source platforms. There isn't a central point where everything is documented, and there is no specific training or certification."
"If you're looking to use canned queries, the interface could be a little more straightforward. It's not immediately intuitive regarding how you use it. You have to take a canned query and paste it into an operational box and then you hit a button... They could improve the ease of deploying these queries."
"We do see continuous improvement all the time, however, I haven't got a specific feature that is lacking or not well designed."
"The interface could be more user-friendly. It''s a small improvement that they could make if they wanted to."
"The playbook development environment is not as rich as it should be. There are multiple occasions when we face problems while creating the playbook."
"We'd like to see more connectors."
"Microsoft should improve Sentinel, considering that from the legacy systems, it cannot collect logs."
"The built-in SOAR is not really good out-of-the-box. The SOAR relies on logic apps and you almost need to have some kind of developer background to be able to make these logic apps. Most security people cannot develop anything..."
"Reporting needs improvement. MTTR and MTTD metrics aren't directly available in playbooks and require manual effort to achieve."
"The reporting, especially custom reporting, needs to be improved. Additionally, it would be better if it could be hosted on Linux."
"Fortinet FortiSOAR should add more documentation for some use cases."
"The solution’s pricing could be improved."
"I have found that Fortinet FortiSOAR needs a lot of improvement. The Orchestration needs to be improved."
"Fortinet FortiSOAR's dashboard is not easy to understand."
"The technology and integrations are important so should continue to be enhanced."
"The UI design of the solution needs to be changed since it can get difficult for a newbie to operate."
"Fortinet's tech support overall is not great when they are at their best."
"The area that needs improvement is integration with multiple third-party vendors."
D3 Security is ranked 19th in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 2 reviews while Fortinet FortiSOAR is ranked 10th in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 12 reviews. D3 Security is rated 9.0, while Fortinet FortiSOAR is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of D3 Security writes "Offers open API for integrating any available tools without any recurring costs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortinet FortiSOAR writes "A stable solution that has a number of available connectors and is simple to automate". D3 Security is most compared with Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR and Splunk SOAR, whereas Fortinet FortiSOAR is most compared with Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR, Swimlane and ServiceNow Security Operations. See our D3 Security vs. Fortinet FortiSOAR report.
See our list of best Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) vendors.
We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.