We compared Datadog and Dynatrace based on our users reviews in five parameters. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:
The setup process for both Datadog and Dynatrace is generally seen as simple and uncomplicated. However, Datadog might necessitate some fine-tuning or the involvement of multiple teams, whereas Dynatrace is regarded as faster and easier to implement. Additionally, Dynatrace only requires a minimal deployment and maintenance effort, usually handled by one or two individuals even in larger settings.
Datadog offers useful features like customizable displays and data analysis, error tracking and log management, developer-friendly interface, and adaptable AI and ML capabilities. In contrast, Dynatrace excels in effortless setup, automatic infrastructure identification, intelligent problem detection, session playback, and comprehensive visibility and monitoring.
- Room for Improvement
Based on the feedback, Datadog could enhance its usability, integration capabilities, user interface intuitiveness, learning curve, monitoring of external websites, SSL security, and setup complexity. In contrast, Dynatrace could improve its user interface for management functions, handling of time zones, installation process, integration with network management tools, licensing process, documentation, and network performance monitoring.
Users have differing opinions on the setup cost of Datadog, with some finding it costly while others find it reasonable in comparison to other options. However, the pricing model lacks documentation and is confusing. In contrast, Dynatrace's pricing structure is complicated and not transparent, making accurate planning difficult. Despite being generally expensive, it provides good value for the money.
Users have reported experiencing various benefits when using Datadog, including time savings and the ability to identify and address blindspots. On the other hand, customers have found Dynatrace to be highly advantageous in terms of return on investment, with cost savings and reduced downtime being key outcomes.
The customer service and support for Datadog and Dynatrace have varying feedback. Some users appreciate the promptness and helpfulness of Datadog's support team, while others have experienced slow or unresponsive support, especially in the Asia-Pacific region. In contrast, Dynatrace generally provides responsive and available customer service, although some customers have encountered slower response times. Dynatrace's support team is praised for giving valuable answers, and they have a highly regarded customer success program called Dynatrace ONE. However, there is a need for improvement in terms of response time for both platforms.
Comparison Results
When comparing Datadog and Dynatrace, Datadog is regarded as simpler to set up and provides more flexibility and extra features. Users appreciate its dashboards, error reporting, user-friendliness, and the wide range of integrations it offers. On the other hand, Dynatrace is praised for its effortless deployment and automatic infrastructure detection, as well as its AI engine and visualization capabilities. However, users mention that improvements could be made to Dynatrace's user interface, licensing process, and documentation. Pricing and ROI experiences vary among users for both products, and customer service and support are generally satisfactory, with some room for enhancement.
"The ability to send notifications based on metadata from the monitor is helpful."
"It lets us react more quickly to things going wrong. Whereas before, it might have been 30 minutes to an hour before we noticed something going on, we will know within a minute or two if something is off, which will let us essentially get something back up and running faster for our customers, which is revenue."
"Datadog has made it much easier to have a central place for people to look for logs and made it much easier to notify them of any elevated error rates or failures."
"Datadog helps us detect issues early on and helps in troubleshooting."
"The ingestion points are unlimited and support customization. We haven't had anything yet that we haven't been able to integrate with it."
"Datadog agents act as an integration to different services, providing easy access and management."
"The Datadog suite has allowed us to easily integrate log collection into all of our services and quickly detect unexpected changes in system data to declare security incidents."
"The solution has improved the organization by providing good insights into app performance and offering good dashboards."
"It can give a quick overview of the current health status, end to end, and can quickly point to the root cause if there an issue or problem in one of our applications."
"Ease of problem detection and alerting, visual timeline, and user-sessions are some of the best features of Dynatrace."
"We purchased some coaching sessions and utilized those, which were very useful."
"We were quite happy with the easy installation process and how quickly we received a good overview over all of our web applications."
"Having a Dynatrace guardian onsite for our first two years helped with our user adoption."
"Dynatrace provide us the in-depth details to know what is wrong in the application and what are performance issues, then really quickly we are able to debug any performance issues or any other performance-related issues."
"We are now able to identify the root cause in 15 minutes. It has helped the entire operations of our company."
"During the building of a system that is new, there are a lot of bugs. Being in the cloud it is very difficult, sometimes, to diagnose where the issues are. Dynatrace gives us that deep insight into errors."
"It can have a more modernized pricing mechanism. We're actually working with them to figure out how to become more modular and have a better and more modernized pricing mechanism. The issue with Datadog is that you have to buy the whole suite of different products, and you kind of get stuck in the old utilization of 40% of their suite. Most organizations today break down between application development, networking, and security. Therefore, there should be a way to break down different modules into just app dev, infosec, networking, etc. Customers have various needs across their business lines, and sometimes, they're just not willing to have tools that they're not using 100%. AppDynamics is probably a little bit better in terms of being modular."
"I'd like to see better pricing and more integration in the next release."
"Datadog is expensive."
"If there were a more cost-effective manner of deploying the tool, we'd be more likely to adopt it more widely."
"Datadog could be improved if it could detect other software in a container or server."
"The Log Explorer could be better. I don't think it has log manipulation as Splunk does."
"We need more integration with security tools like Drata."
"Lately, chat support has a longer waiting time."
"C language integration requires manual implementation through the SDK, which is rather difficult and time consuming."
"A useful addition for known issues would be the ability to automatically perform certain activities as a first attempt to resolve issues which are creating a problem."
"It still has a long way to go to reach that single pane of glass."
"We're not quite there yet, but the thing I would like to see is to really have that view of how issues relate to the business. Often enough, the tools that IT have for IT stop at the IT level. They cannot go into the business level part. They can't understand, because they don't have the information that the business needs to provide them with - for example how much an hour of downtime costs the business. For us, in IT, it's an hour of downtime, but it equates to money and equates to hours lost and equates to a lot of things, and often enough we don't have that information. This is where I would like to see us going."
"The integration between the web monitoring of Dynatrace and OneAgent. "
"Data streaming and dashboard loading can be improved to reduce dashboard latency."
"If you want to see a month's data, it keeps on spinning. Here is an improvement which needs to happen, which is the case with all applications or tools. There is a lot of data, and either we have to change the way we are logging or the application needs to be enhanced."
"With Dynatrace in our environment, the managed server required root access to run. As a government agency with tight security, this has been an audit concern for us."
Datadog is ranked 1st in AIOps with 137 reviews while Dynatrace is ranked 2nd in AIOps with 340 reviews. Datadog is rated 8.6, while Dynatrace is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Datadog writes "Very good RUM, synthetics, and infrastructure host maps". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Dynatrace writes "AI identifies all the components of a response-time issue or failure, hugely benefiting our triage efforts". Datadog is most compared with Azure Monitor, New Relic, AWS X-Ray, Elastic Observability and AppDynamics, whereas Dynatrace is most compared with New Relic, AppDynamics, Splunk Enterprise Security, Azure Monitor and Elastic Observability. See our Datadog vs. Dynatrace report.
See our list of best Log Management vendors, best Container Monitoring vendors, and best AIOps vendors.
We monitor all AIOps reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
We also selected Dynatrace but for different reasons.
We were looking for a solution that integrated user experience to backend systems. The RUM data captured by Dynatrace and integration to the transaction trace is phenomenal.
Datadog was lacking in the APM space when we evaluated and was very limited specifically in real user monitoring.
I've seen an early preview of Dyantrace's latest logging capabilities and can say I'm very excited, to say the least. The solution is automated and traced. For a comprehensive solution to improve observability and reduce outage times we are very happy with Dynatrace.
Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether the Datadog or Dynatrace network monitoring software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Dynatrace. Dynatrace offers network monitoring capabilities that take into account their users’ need for the most in-depth and accurate information and solutions. It offers analysis powered by a cutting-edge and fully automated AI. This artificial intelligence is designed to spot in real time any issue that might appear in the network on both the code and the infrastructure levels. Network administrators will be offered an in-depth analysis of the issue. The report will show the nature of the problem, where in the network it can be located, and potential solutions that can be implemented. Dynatrace’s real-time reporting significantly cuts down the response time of administrators to issues.
Datadog’s network monitoring software does not offer AI reporting or analysis. While it does offer features that enable users to track issues in their networks, it does not offer anything that is as robust and in-depth as Dynatrace’s fully automated AI. Administrators have to go and constantly monitor the network for issues instead of receiving automatic notifications that can direct them to the problems at hand.
Dynatrace’s dashboards can take the data that the AI collects and lay it out for the administrative or executive teams in clear ways. It is easy to customize these dashboards according to what you need. In fact, the creation of dashboards is now automated. You tell the software what you want to see and it will build the dashboard for you.
Datadog offers dashboards that provide near real-time visibility. They track the health of the network applications and provide indicators of the network’s overall condition. These dashboards are somewhat easy to create. However, they lack the automation that Dynatrace provides.
Conclusion
While Datadog offers a solution that can provide effective network monitoring, Dynatrace’s features make it a better option. Its AI and automation make it a far more effective product.