We performed a comparison between Delinea Secret Server and Fudo PAM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Support is helpful."
"The solution's stability is flawless."
"One valuable feature is that it will support a dedicated database. Delinea provides multiple features, like reporting and remote password changes."
"I really like the zero trust piece."
"I find it really easy and computer confident, and the experience with the product is really good. Additionally, customizations are easy."
"The GUI interface is well-designed and user-friendly."
"Provides us with the ability to control access [to secrets] by groups."
"The ability to give some groups access to different kind of databases with the storage of a password is the most valuable feature."
"The main benefit of the solution is that it's very easy to set up. It only takes a couple of hours to install everything."
"Session recording and password management are the two main aspects."
"Fudo PAM was the most flexible and intuitive interface out of all of the products in the PAM sector."
"it's perfect to control and administer computers in our company."
"We are convinced that Fudo PAM is better than competing products like WALLIX."
"This product is excellent in every way except minor details in handling extremely large environments."
"It would be better if they had a Linux version of the secret server."
"When working with larger enterprises Thycotic Secret Server becomes a little cumbersome to work with because they do not allow as much flexibility as some of the other competitors, such as CyberArk. Thycotic Secret Server could improve by being more flexible when it comes to customization, and increase the number of API integrations."
"Delinea Secret Server can improve by extending the monitoring policies and making the performance better."
"The challenge for me with Delinea is that I may not be able to pitch it to an account with a low budget for PAM."
"Its remote support feature needs improvement."
"Support could be better. I have heard about a lot of problems in the Bangladesh market. People are saying that there are support issues. So, Delinea should focus on support and services."
"The integration with the ticketing system ServiceNow is complex."
"Professional training and certification would be great."
"The configuration is difficult."
"Fudo PAM’s scalability is not very strong."
"The stability is not very good."
"I would like to see better server management. You have to know exactly what you're looking for to get the right server."
Delinea Secret Server is ranked 2nd in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 47 reviews while Fudo PAM is ranked 22nd in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 5 reviews. Delinea Secret Server is rated 8.2, while Fudo PAM is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Delinea Secret Server writes "Effective for password rotation policies triggered by audit requirements, it helps maintain compliance standards and seamless integration with third-party tools ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fudo PAM writes "Easy to install but needs to provide better server management and organization". Delinea Secret Server is most compared with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Azure Key Vault, HashiCorp Vault, IBM Security Secret Server and ManageEngine PAM360, whereas Fudo PAM is most compared with WALLIX Bastion, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, One Identity Safeguard, Teleport and ManageEngine PAM360. See our Delinea Secret Server vs. Fudo PAM report.
See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
