We performed a comparison between Delinea Secret Server and One Identity Safeguard based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I really like the zero trust piece."
"The solution is scalable."
"Support is helpful."
"The secret template, password rotation, and recording sessions are the most valuable."
"The discovery engine is really robust and flexible. It had some session management features that are better compared to some other vendors. Overall the GUI is very good and straightforward to operate compared to other solutions. For example, CyberArk and Hitachi tend to be hard to navigate."
"What I like best about this product is the interface."
"I have found most valuable the automatic scheduled password rotation and remote desktop monitoring. Additionally, the documentation is readily available and easy to find and the dashboard is straightforward."
"It works for us."
"The technical support is tremendous."
"I like Safeguard's snapshot feature that enables us to review the last time an application was opened and by whom. If there are any issues, we can look behind the scenes to see what has been done. We can suspend a user's access or close off a server."
"It's a good solution for managing identities under OneFile for authorization."
"The customer service and technical support are very good."
"The solution's most valuable features are the efficiency and the quality of the recording."
"The initial setup is very easy."
"The transparent mode for privileged sessions is a very good solution."
"The monitoring system is very good."
"What needs improvement? The product can be improved by reducing the number of updates provided."
"I'd prefer a better commercial model that includes partners and options for consulting around it. Where I've worked with my customers, we've only been able to use their professional services, and that has been a risk and constraint."
"In terms of what could be improved, the whole thing with distributed engines, et cetera, is a little bit tricky."
"The tool should integrate additional features like OCR."
"Installation can sometimes be difficult, depending on the environment."
"The UI needs improvement because the interface is a little clumsy."
"We faced some upgrade issues, especially during the management and administration parts. I found it less straightforward than on many other platforms, even outside password managers."
"They could improve the container platform and SPO."
"I just received a question from a customer in regards to a connection with Oracle OID. I tried to integrate Safeguard with the Oracle YAML as well as something else to manage the groups and users from a different system, like AD or LDAP. This one feature could be better. At this moment, the platform system can only use the integration with LDAP or AD. The software for research and development to create a connector to a YAML platform can be very complicated."
"We would like to have the option of importing assets by using the CSV file. It was available in the earlier versions, but it is not available now."
"When we compare One Identity Safeguard with Cyberark, we know CyberArk has other tools or other features that are more complex and more useful for the customers. For example, I have one customer that wants to elevate the permission that is available in CyberArk."
"There is a lack of documentation and many problems with the plugins."
"The GUI has room for improvement because it is confusing and cumbersome."
"We can't review or audit HTTP and HTTPS. This functionality should be added so that we can review and audit HTTP and HTTPS."
"The high availability function of the box requires a long time to switch over from one appliance to another."
"Cost-wise, it is a little bit expensive, which makes it difficult to get management approval. Its price should be reduced."
Delinea Secret Server is ranked 2nd in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 47 reviews while One Identity Safeguard is ranked 4th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 38 reviews. Delinea Secret Server is rated 8.2, while One Identity Safeguard is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Delinea Secret Server writes "Effective for password rotation policies triggered by audit requirements, it helps maintain compliance standards and seamless integration with third-party tools ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of One Identity Safeguard writes "Provides us with centralized storage of secrets and credentials, and visibility into the use of privileged access". Delinea Secret Server is most compared with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Azure Key Vault, HashiCorp Vault, IBM Security Secret Server and Keeper, whereas One Identity Safeguard is most compared with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, WALLIX Bastion, BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access, Fudo PAM and ObserveIT. See our Delinea Secret Server vs. One Identity Safeguard report.
See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Hello Avinash, it all depends on the timeline and urgency of the project. If you need to deploy a PAM tool that focuses on standing privileges, stopping lateral movement, and incorporating Zero Standing Privileges as part of Zero Trust, then please consider looking at Remediant. I've worked for BeyondTrust and have gone up against the other big players such as Delinea, Centrify, CyberArk, and HashiCorp. They more or less all offer similar solutions, but looking at your current requirements, Remediant really excels in delivering a simple, yet very effective tool in a matter of days and weeks, not months and years.