We performed a comparison between Denodo and Oracle GoldenGate based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is a very stable solution."
"The performance and the speed to market are the most valuable features of this solution."
"The most valuable aspects of this solution are the short time frame in which you can deliver and connect."
"In general, it's good for us to make tests so we can scout the data."
"The most valuable features of Denodo are the extraction option for adapters, and there are many things for the views, that are cached. Denodo is not storing the data, it looks first to tune the query, and these things are for the agents."
"The most valuable features are query optimization and the single language independence from the sources we're using to catch data."
"It allows a lot of traceability and you can decide what data you want to collect"
"Denodo's best features are its performance, easy data transformation, and the job scheduler."
"With Oracle GoldenGate, you can easily sync the tables and put them into the ODS database."
"It works best with Oracle."
"They've recently improved the ease of implementation."
"Data migration is the most valuable feature of Oracle GoldenGate."
"The replication of the data table is one of the best features."
"Oracle GoldenGate helps to select and target specific tables for replication. Any changes or operations on those tables are immediately reflected in the source and target environments."
"The most valuable features of Oracle GoldenGate are the schema application and performance."
"The most valuable feature is data replication capability."
"The integration could use improvement, it's a lot of non-speed line processes that we have discovered, in the country. The configurations could use a lot more improvement."
"The git configuration really should be improved."
"Sometimes, Windows-related functions do not work properly in Denodo. The analytic functions in SQL do not work properly."
"I would like to see a connectivity option with third-party apps, for example, JDBC, and ODBC drivers. Currently, we need to install it separately from the Denodo side and then connect it."
"Tasks such as conversion of a date format or conversion of a number format that can be done in a very easy way in different languages, like SQL or Oracle, are not so easy to do in Denodo. For example, if you want to convert a date from one format to another, in Oracle it's pretty easy; in Denodo, however, it requires so many lines of code. Simple things that can be done very quickly in other database languages require more lines of code in Denodo."
"We would like this solution to be more universally user-friendly. At present it is really only aimed at IT specialists."
"The solution should have its own acceleration technology."
"User-specific security at the column and row levels needs to be improved. Instead of applying security at every individual level, it would be better if it were at the group or tier level. It will save a lot of time."
"The front-end management isn't very good."
"It would be better for Oracle Golden Gate Studio GUI to include other licensed products (i.e. Veridata or others)."
"It is not a very stable tool, and you need to monitor it perfectly."
"The product is not easy to use."
"The process of transforming the data between two different databases is inefficient and needs to be improved."
"It would be great if Oracle added some enhanced features or more functionalities to Oracle GoldenGate."
"Troubleshooting issues is not always the easiest. It should be easier to troubleshoot. Their support can also be improved. They don't read your problem statement and waste a lot of time. GoldenGate for big data is actually a separate license. It is sort of a separate product, but it might fall underneath your GoldenGate category. If we're talking about big data, its interaction with big data sources is poorly documented."
"The solution needs to improve its latency, monitoring and support."
Denodo is ranked 12th in Data Integration with 29 reviews while Oracle GoldenGate is ranked 6th in Data Integration with 48 reviews. Denodo is rated 7.8, while Oracle GoldenGate is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Denodo writes "Saves our underwriters' time with data virtualization, but could provide more learning resources". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle GoldenGate writes "Performs real-time replication without data loss, but we cannot do much automation". Denodo is most compared with Azure Data Factory, AWS Glue, Mule Anypoint Platform, Delphix and Informatica PowerCenter, whereas Oracle GoldenGate is most compared with AWS Database Migration Service, Qlik Replicate, Quest SharePlex, Azure Data Factory and Oracle Data Integrator (ODI). See our Denodo vs. Oracle GoldenGate report.
See our list of best Data Integration vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
