Device42 vs Optinum Path VisualDataCenter comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Device42
Ranking in Data Center Infrastructure Management
3rd
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
25
Ranking in other categories
IT Asset Management (4th), Configuration Management Databases (2nd), IP Address Management (IPAM) Tools (4th)
Optinum Path VisualDataCenter
Ranking in Data Center Infrastructure Management
23rd
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Data Center Infrastructure Management category, the market share of Device42 is 4.6% and it increased by 40.2% compared to the previous year. The market share of Optinum Path VisualDataCenter is 0.9% and it increased by Infinity% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Center Infrastructure Management
Unique Categories:
IT Asset Management
4.8%
Configuration Management Databases
16.7%
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

LB
Jan 12, 2023
The REST API abilities enables us to run scripts that push all the information we need into Device42
The architecture is a bit old-fashioned. Device42 is on one server and runs as a closed appliance as a virtual machine or guest. We are loading more into Device42 than it can hold. Overloading Device42 with REST API calls or tasks will directly impact every aspect because the server will be too busy to answer requests. that is why we invented some creative ways to reduce that load from devicd42. A better system would be a frontend server with a backend server and a database-like architecture. The fact that everything is one server causes a significant performance problem. It would be better if Device42 could restructure the product and make it more scalable.
Use Optinum Path VisualDataCenter?
Share your opinion

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"On a yearly basis, our licensing is $10,000. However, our license is now nearly full with devices. We need the next bigger license with 5,000 devices, which will cost us $19,000. We pay for a set of licenses, a maximum number of devices, and a maximum number of IP addresses. We have the smallest amount of features, which is enough for us at this time."
"The problem with using other vendor, like BMC, is the pricing. The price is so horrible and nobody wants to pay this money."
"Functionality-wise, Device42 is on par with industry standards, but price-wise, the solution is expensive. I'm rating the pricing for the solution as eight out of ten."
"We pay $100,000 per year."
"Our licensing costs are on a yearly basis."
"The product cost is low. It is quite cheap."
"It's in the top-three most expensive solutions in terms of cost, but it has all the features that are needed."
"I am not involved in its pricing, but I have seen their plans during a discussion with the customer. For 500 servers, they were asking 50,000 USD. The cost of BMC Discovery was less than half. For the same thing, they were charging only 10,000 USD. Its pricing needs to be improved. As compared to other discovery tools, such as BMC Discovery and ServiceNow Discovery, its price is a little bit higher."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Center Infrastructure Management solutions are best for your needs.
787,226 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Healthcare Company
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Device42?
Based on the use case for Device42, I found the solution a bit expensive. However, when you look at the support and the industry standards, Device42 was on par with the industry. Device42 is a litt...
What needs improvement with Device42?
The product must provide AI features. It would be very useful if I could create datasets or queries from an AI interface.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Computershare, Concur, Doosan, Fitch Ratings Inc., Fujitsu, HomeAway, Jasper Wireless, Mercedes-Benz, Square, Twitch, UCSB, Zayo Group Inc.
Raytheon, IBM, BBVA, Siemens, Shell, BayCare Health System, The City of New York, MTN, CSX, Toshiba, Alestra, Data Bank