We performed a comparison between Digital.ai Application Security and PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Tools."I used the tool to prepare for the interview as a Business Developer. It helped me improve my understanding on software security."
"The extension that it provides with the community version for the skills mapping is excellent."
"It was easy to learn."
"BurpSuite helps us to identify and fix silly mistakes that are sometimes introduced by our developers in their coding."
"The tool provides complimentary services. It allows you to add a lot of extensions, and you can get extensions quite often. It is quite a flexible application."
"It offers very good accuracy. You can trust the results."
"The feature that we have found most valuable is that it comes with pre-set configurations. They have a set of predefined options where you can pick one and start scanning. We also have the option of creating our own configurations, like how often do the applications need to be scanned."
"The Spider is the most useful feature. It helps to analyze the entire web application, and it finds all the passes and offers an automated identification of security issues."
"This solution has helped a lot in finding bugs and vulnerabilities, and the scanner is good enough for simple web apps."
"I would like the tool to integrate AI and automation that is dedicated to detecting software vulnerabilities."
"If we're running a huge number of scans regularly, it slows down the tool."
"The biggest drawback is reporting. It's not so good. I can download them, but they're not so informative."
"The Initial setup is a bit complex."
"I am from Brazil. The currency exchange rate from a dollar to a Brazilian Real is quite steep. It is almost six to one. It would be good if it can be sold in the local currency, and its price is cheaper for us."
"The reporting needs to be improved; it is very bad."
"If your application uses multi-factor authentication, registration management cannot be automated."
"The scanner and crawler need to be improved."
"I would like to see the return of the spider mechanism instead of the crawling feature. Burp Suite's earlier version 1.7 had an excellent spider option, and it would be beneficial if Burp incorporated those features into the current version. The crawling techniques used in the current version are not as efficient as those used in earlier versions."
More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
Digital.ai Application Security is ranked 36th in Application Security Tools with 1 review while PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is ranked 9th in Application Security Tools with 57 reviews. Digital.ai Application Security is rated 6.0, while PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Digital.ai Application Security writes "Helps to improve knowledge on software security ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional writes "The solution is versatile and easy to deploy, but it needs to give more detailed security reports". Digital.ai Application Security is most compared with SonarQube and Fortify Application Defender, whereas PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is most compared with OWASP Zap, Fortify WebInspect, Acunetix and HCL AppScan.
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.